home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!tulane!uflorida!elm.circa.ufl.edu!djohns
- From: djohns@elm.circa.ufl.edu (David A. Johns)
- Newsgroups: alt.usage.english
- Subject: Re: Frosh (was Re: Sexist language (was...
- Message-ID: <38032@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu>
- Date: 25 Dec 92 02:06:30 GMT
- References: <BzG3B8.Kvz@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> <1992Dec18.233553.1@indyvax.iupui.edu> <BzJpFu.AG5@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu>
- Sender: news@uflorida.cis.ufl.edu
- Organization: University of Florida, Gainesville
- Lines: 12
- Nntp-Posting-Host: elm.circa.ufl.edu
-
- In article <BzJpFu.AG5@constellation.ecn.uoknor.edu> mmmirash@banshee.ecn.uoknor.edu (Mandar M. Mirashi) writes:
-
- # However, no one has been able to put together an effective argument
- # that challenges the superiority of English English. I think the
- # reason behind this is that IT'S A FACT. *No one* can dispute that
- # English spread from England to other lands.
-
- How do you say "non sequitur" in English?
-
- David
-
-
-