home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!wupost!waikato.ac.nz!comp.vuw.ac.nz!actrix!templar!jbickers
- Newsgroups: alt.sys.amiga.demos
- Subject: Re: Criti!
- Message-ID: <jbickers.0mc5@templar.actrix.gen.nz>
- From: jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz (John Bickers)
- Date: 31 Dec 92 19:54:23 PST
- References: <92340.091921AMS176@psuvm.psu.edu> <1992Dec5.164843.2427@ifi.uio.no>
- <J.Gallagher.25.724978713@unsw.EDU.AU> <10357@cbmger.de.so.commodore.com>
- Organization: TAP
- Lines: 18
-
- Quoted from <10357@cbmger.de.so.commodore.com> by peterk@cbmger.de.so.commodore.com (Dr Peter Kittel Germany):
-
- > As I already explained in a different posting, it's an issue of
- > the definition of terms, and this is obviously varying among people.
-
- The "waveforms" that you are talking about are actually samples
- generated by sampling a waveform equation. The C=64 SID chip is
- the sort of thing that uses real waveform parameters.
-
- When the Amiga first came out, I was disappointed that it didn't
- use a "super-SID" like a souped-up C=64 would have, instead going
- for simple sampling. In the end, it turns out using samples is
- better, eh?
-
- > Best regards, Dr. Peter Kittel // E-Mail to \\ Only my personal opinions...
- --
- *** John Bickers, TAP. jbickers@templar.actrix.gen.nz ***
- *** "Radioactivity - It's in the air, for you and me" - Kraftwerk ***
-