NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/alt/supermod/2608

Text File | 1992-12-22 | 7.8 KB | 237 lines

Newsgroups: alt.supermodels
Path: sparky!uunet!nwnexus!lof
From: [e-mail] (Jim Stuckey)
Subject: Re: AH, A GROUP FOR JERK-OFF NERDS!
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Followup-To: /dev/null
Keywords: flame
Sender: [e-mail] (System Security Officer)
Organization: LOF Bureau of Zippy-isms
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Distribution: na
Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 01:05:55 GMT
Lines: 222

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Victor P. Panlilio) writes:
>(FLAME ON, Level 2 on a scale of 1 to 10)
>

    Aw, come on, haven't we heard enough of this shit?

>In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Yamanari) writes:
>
>>    Drum role please, this one needs all the build up it can get.
>         ^^^^
>The spelling, in case you didn't know, is R-O-L-L. Drum roll.
>(in which I violate netiquette and point out spelling mistakes)
>

    Yes. Big time.

>>>as in, social defect.
>>
>>    OOOoooo.  I get it now.  Duh.
>>    Maybe we need some self-inserted humor.  This one isn't
>>    exactly a knee slapper.
>
>It wasn't meant to be. If you think it was supposed to be one,
>you need to have a brain transplant. Well, it might help....

    Ad homina attacks usually don't work very well.

>
>As for self-inserted humour, try a 10M HCl enema up your anus.
>You might be able to wake up some stray active brain cells.
>

    Hmm. I'd personally recommend 18M H2SO4.. chance that the HCL MIGHT
not doo too much damage, due to the mucous and fecal matter in the large
intestine. Better yet, some powdered Sulphur Trioxide..


>>    Ok, guys, give me the moronic laugh track--you know, the one
>>    used for shows like Studs.
>
>Who're you talking to? And I didn't know what show "Studs" was
>until some friends told me about it...it seems that since you
>know so well what the show IS like, you're really the moron for
>watching it. So who's the geek -- the one who watches Studs and
>knows that it has a moronic laugh track, or the one who goes out
>and photographs beautiful models and has a lot of fun doing so?
>

    Now, Victor, no offense, but if you keep using the same flame material
time after time, it gets tired. I *know* you get to photograph
a lot of, well, babes. So? Does this make you cool or uncool? Does watching
"Studs" make this (IMHO) bozo cool or uncool? If so, why?

>>    Maybe elaborate a little more.  Another d- joke?  Sure,
>>    what the hell.  Couldn't be much worse than the last one.
>
>If you think any of my stuff was supposed to be a joke, then
>you're DEFINITELY an imbecile or a cretin or worse.  8^)
>

    Smiley faces don't make ad homina attacks work better.

>>    Boy, those *-emoters are hip.
>
>Call them whatever you want. Maybe flaunt your big vocabulary.
>

    This wasn't too bad.. :-)

>>>Maybe I should crank up my flamethrower a bit more?
>>
>>    Ignornce is bliss.  He's still at it.  Boy, bad comics
>    ^^^^^^^^
>Something the matter with your hand-eye coordination, too?

    Again with the spelling flame? Come on, Victor, I'm *sure* you're
batter than THIS!

>Maybe you've been using your hands too much, lately.  ;^)

    Heh. OK. Jerk off jokes are kind of silly too.. I mean, seriously.
Craks like that only work on repressed people, like the kind you tend to
find a lot of south of your border. :-)




>(Nurse, give me a bigger scalpel...I have to fix this...)
>
>>    ... the just ought to shoot them and put them out of their
>        ^^^
>Missing a "y" at the end. Oh, did your neurons misfire again?

    Oh, botheration. OK, one time here. I myself am capable of typing
(no errors, really) ~130 wpm. I *can* hit 150+ (if you don't mind the odd
"misspeling" :-). Now, this isn't remarkable. Really. It's VERY easy to mess
up when you are typing. Just cause this guy doesn't have a spell checker,
well, that's no reason to flame.


>
>>    misery.
>
>Well, even Robin Williams got his latest movie "Toys" trashed, so
>I shouldn't have to feel so bad, should I?
>
>As for bad comics and what we should do about them, I say we just
>suffer them. On the other hand, arrogant imbeciles should be put
>in chain gangs to work on repairing the potholed city streets...
>

    So, who decideds who's an "arrogant imbecile"? Me, well, I'll
admit to being arrogant, but, hey, it's just a state of mind. Like insanity. :)

>>>Nah, it's Christmas -- I'll be a bit more charitable and just
>>>call him a
>>
>>    Ooo, not another joke.     There go another bunch of'em.
>
>Still think I was joking? Gee, you're worse off than I feared...
>
>(Nurse, forceps, please....)
>
>>>disease
>>
>>    Ho ho.  So clever with these d- jokes.
>
>You are so astute. Such a _fine_ specimen of human intellectual
>evolution. Perhaps we should PET-scan your brain to determine if
>the glucose uptake in your cerebral cortex is higher than normal
>for mental retards. I'm sure your doctors will be astounded....
>
    Lame. (Not that what you're responding to is better, just to give you
credit :-) )

>
>>    Vic, stay out of the flaming business.  This was just
>
>Are you the enforcer of who can and cannot flame? Good luck, bozo.

    Yet earlier you say that "arrogant imbeciles" should be put on
chain gangs. Dost thou see thine own double standard?

>
>>    plain lame.  In fact, if anything, you did a pretty good
>
>You think any of the above is still lame? How'd you like a sample
>of other insults I generally keep well-concealed because of their
>sheer toxicity? Maybe we could try shifting some of your valence
>electrons one orbital up to see if you can still be supercilious?
>

    Wouldn't work.

>Your DNA is definitely made from utility-grade base pairs. Try
>not to flaunt it so much on the net, it's too sad to watch...
>

    Come on, this isn't Alt.flame.scientific!

>>    job of confirming that the people on this newsgroup
>>    ARE geeks and social misfits, because what kind of
>
>And who are you to be so well-qualified to pass such judgment on
>any of us, hmmm? Photographed any beautiful models lately, sport?

    Well, this bullshit about anyone that reads this group
being geeks, etc, well, what a load of rubbish. I still don't understand
the connection between taking photographs and being either cool, or uncool.
Now, before you call me stupid, don't waste your time.

>
>>    pathetic loser makes a post like that?
>
>The kind of pathetic loser who has to turn away people who keep
>asking me to photograph them -- for portraits, weddings, model
>portfolios, and sometimes, glamorous semi-nude or nude pictures.
>
>(in which I revert to my obnoxious bragging-dork net-persona)

    You said it, I didn't :-)

>
>Sheesh. What a sorry geek, loser, and misfit I truly AM!
>
>*sob*
>
>(Not!)
>
>>    "If you can't eat sand, why the hell are you living in a desert?"
>>         Rule 1:  "Don't have more children than you can feed."
>>            Nuclear redevelopment for a better world!
>
>These kinds of .sigs speak volumes about the people who use them.
>Actually, you have a fine personality, but not for a human being.

    And yet, you speak volumes earlier about what is funny/not-funny,
or serious,not serious. I can come up with some .sig quotes that might curl
hair. Doesn't mean I mean it.


>
>(Nurse, I give up...close him up and send him to the zoo....)
>
>(Level 2 FLAME OFF)
>
>Anyone want to see my Level 3? It singes people quite nicely.
>
>8^)

Later.

===============================================================================
| [e-mail] is:    | Vote Faa and Mith. |  "Remember... Don't throw     |
|    Jim Stuckey     |      in '96        |   rocks at a man with a       |
|    -Faa King,     |--------------------|   machine gun"                |
|    Ruler of     | WFAA Radio: Rocking|--------------------------------
|    The Land Of Faa  |the world, whenever | "Of course we like him best,  |
|                        |we get around to it |  we met him first!"           |
===============================================================================