home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:12761 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:11165 alt.politics.clinton:19442 alt.politics.bush:15329 alt.politics.homosexuality:8774
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!nic.umass.edu!news.amherst.edu!twpierce
- From: twpierce@unix.amherst.edu (Tim Pierce)
- Subject: Re: Sexuality
- Message-ID: <C06LIz.JA2@unix.amherst.edu>
- Organization: Elitist Usenet Administrators, Stuff and Nonsense Division
- References: <1992Dec30.210106.23193@lclark.edu> <1ht66dINN65k@hp-col.col.hp.com>
- Distribution: usa
- Date: Fri, 1 Jan 1993 15:25:46 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <1ht66dINN65k@hp-col.col.hp.com> smithw@col.hp.com (Walter Smith) writes:
-
- >snodgras@lclark.edu (Bil Snodgrass) writes:
- >
- >> They have that option. Those who want to send their kids at a later
- >> age will send their children when they see fit or they may even opted
- >> out of sending their children period.......
- >>
- >> Now...are yo willing to allow a class on sexuality that shows
- >> homosexuality and heterosexuality in the same unbiased light, a
- >> class that would be optional....?
- >
- >Not in pre-school, or early elementary school.
-
- Walter, you're contradicting yourself something *awful*. Your biggest
- complaint about the proposed curriculum is that it takes away the
- parents' ability to decide when their children are taught this
- material. Bil's suggestion leaves it up to the parents when, *if
- ever*, they send their children to this class. I don't see what your
- objection is to this proposal.
-
- --
- ____ Tim Pierce /
- \ / twpierce@unix.amherst.edu / Rocks say goodbye.
- \/ (BITnet: TWPIERCE@AMHERST) /
-