NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/alt/rushlim/12695

Internet Message Format | 1992-12-31 | 3.7 KB

Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:12695 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:11109 alt.politics.clinton:19396 alt.politics.bush:15268 alt.politics.homosexuality:8727
Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!uwm.edu!rutgers!news.columbia.edu!cunixb.cc.columbia.edu!rj24
From: [e-mail] (Robert  Johnston)
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
Subject: Re: Sexuality
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Date: 31 Dec 92 21:00:21 GMT
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (The Network News)
Reply-To: [e-mail] (Robert  Johnston)
Organization: Columbia University
Lines: 57
Nntp-Posting-Host: cunixb.cc.columbia.edu

In article <[e-mail]> [e-mail] (Walter Smith) writes:
>[e-mail] (Robert  Johnston) writes:
>> problem is that youimplied that you believe that religion is the
>> reason for monogamy, and ignored the fact that there are obvious
>> social and emotional reasons for one to enjoy a monogamous relationship.
>> By blinding yourself to these reasons, you show yourself for the fool you
>> are.
>
>Did I say that?  I *asked* why he thought monogamy is the way to go;
>I didn't pass judgement on his reasons, or try to force mine on him.
>The 'social and emotional reasons' are obvious to me, I wanted to hear
>his view.  Your *obvious* anti-Christian biases is causing you to see
>things that aren't there, Rob.
>

Walter, you aparently have a difficult time with reading. My point
was that if you were unable to infer the reasons for his monogamy from
his post and your life experience, then You are either very stupid,  or
you believe that the only reason for monogamy is religion.

>> Should a black man retain the friendship of a KKK member? Should a Jew
>> befriend a Nazi? Should Salman Rushdie crave the Ayatollah's
>> friendship?
>>
>> When someone says that people of my type are not worthy of life, I do not
>> make that person my friend. This is exactly the attitude of many christians
>> towards homosexuals.
>
>Not worthy of life?  Get a grip.  If that were the case, you wouldn't be able
>to openly post that you are gay and live to tell about it.  That is just plain
>*absurd*.  There's no doubt that homosexuality is looked down upon, but
>'not worthy of life'??  And comparing Nazi-Jew with Christian-Gay?  Ppfftt...
>How can you possibly believe so many people hate you to that degree, and
>not lose your sanity?  If 'homophobe' is considered an appropriate term
>for someone who 'dislikes' homosexuality, then there needs to be a stronger
>term for those who have paranoid delusions that Christians think you're
>not worthy of life, and would do to you what the Nazis did to the Jews.
>If that isn't paranoid-phobic.....................
>
>Walter

Well gee, my copy of the bible says that homosexuals are to be put to
death. (or, at the very least, gay men.) Are you telling me that you don't
believe in the bible?

Have you been following the news lately walter? All sorts of anti-gay
legislation is being proposed in many different states. Persecution
begins with suchminor, insignificant things.

Perhaps you would not kill homosexuals yourself. I am sure this holds
true for most people. But you give every apearance of being someone
who thinks that the world would be a better place without homosexuals.

By the way Walter, you seem to have assumed that I am homosexual.
On what basis do you make this assumption? Perhaps you feel that only
a homosexual could be angered by such subtle gay bashing as you
practice. This to me is the surest sign that you are a bigot.