home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:12558 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10974 alt.politics.clinton:19291 alt.politics.bush:15132 alt.politics.homosexuality:8619
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ux1.cts.eiu.edu!cfthb
- From: cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu (Howard Black)
- Subject: Re: Sexuality
- Message-ID: <1992Dec31.014201.16735@ux1.cts.eiu.edu>
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 01:42:01 GMT
- Distribution: usa
- References: <1992Dec30.192655.5920@ux1.cts.eiu.edu> <1992Dec30.194335.8233@asl.dl.nec.com> <1992Dec31.000514.21542@anasazi.com>
- Organization: Eastern Illinois University
- Lines: 15
-
- In article <1992Dec31.000514.21542@anasazi.com> briand@anasazi.com (Brian Douglass) writes:
- >
- >I don't know which is right, lifestyle or biological. Maybe both, maybe
- >neither, the evidence is still just too evenly split. So to argue one side
- >or the other is just an exercise in futility, as there is no right or wrong
- >answer.
-
- Actually, I also feel the answer is irrelevant (that is, the nature vs.
- nurture question). Neither is justification of legislated bigotry or
- judgement calls.
-
- --
- ******************************************************************
- Howard Black cfthb@ux1.cts.eiu.edu
- Department of Chemistry Eastern Illinois Univ.
-