home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!emory!emoryu1!libwca
- From: libwca@emory.edu (Bill Anderson)
- Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh
- Subject: Re: Columbus vs Indians (was Re: PC lives)
- Message-ID: <1705@emoryu1.cc.emory.edu>
- Date: 28 Dec 92 17:48:10 GMT
- References: <1hd02iINNbi5@cronkite.Central.Sun.COM>
- Organization: Emory University, Atlanta, GA
- Lines: 31
- X-Newsreader: Tin 1.1 PL3
-
- dbernard@clesun.Central.Sun.COM (Dave Bernard) writes:
- :
- : Actually, the reports I've read indicate that the missionairies were very
- : concerned with the Indians, at least those who converted and were under
- : their charge. There are constant reports of their complaints to the king
- : regarding ill-treatment of Indians by the civil authorities & armies. Like
- : missionaries- medical, spritual, teaching- everywhere, they seem to have taken
- : the welfare of their people very seriously.
- :
- : Dave
-
- Some of them did. Most of our knowledge of Spanish attrocities in
- the new world comes from priests wh protested against it; this
- attitude certainly wasn't universal among the clergy, however.
- Many of them used Indians as slave labor at their missions, and
- many of them persecuted Indians who refused to convert. Whether
- the conversions themselves were harmful is an open question, but
- the priests can't really be blamed for that; they truly thought
- they were doing good by replacing indiginous superstitions with
- their own.
- The entire clash of cultures which resulted from Columbus'
- discoveries is enormously complex, and it's really silly to
- break it down into a Good Natives vs. Bad Europeans kind of
- thing, but since we spent hundreds of years casting it as a
- Good Europeans vs. Brutal Savages episode, the backlash was
- probably inevitable. With any luck, it'll fade, and we'll
- be able to view the whole thing with a modicum of objectivity
- some day.
- And monkeys might fly out of my butt...
-
- Bill
-