NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #31/NN_1992_31.iso/spool/alt/rushlim/12313

Internet Message Format | 1992-12-26 | 1.8 KB

Xref: sparky alt.rush-limbaugh:12313 alt.politics.clinton:19126 alt.politics.bush:14941 alt.politics.homosexuality:8465 alt.fan.rush-limbaugh:10734
Newsgroups: alt.rush-limbaugh,alt.politics.clinton,alt.politics.bush,alt.politics.homosexuality,alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
Path: sparky!uunet!paladin.american.edu!howland.reston.ans.net!wupost!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cso.uiuc.edu!gauss!berger
From: berger@gauss (Mike Berger)
Subject: Re: Showering in the Military (Re: Gays in the Military..what nobody is talking about: )
References: <[e-mail]> <[e-mail]>
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Sender: [e-mail] (Net Noise owner)
Organization: University of Illinois at Urbana
Distribution: usa
Date: Sat, 26 Dec 1992 21:47:15 GMT
Lines: 20

[e-mail] (A.P.K.) writes:
>Then what ARE you addressing, if not such incidents?  I cited one,
>which was reported to me personally, and you write it off as anecdotal.
>I understand that, somewhat, in that it becomes second-hand knowledge
>to you personally.  However, it was reported -- to me, and I and another
>NCO dealt with it accordingly (and not nearly as harshly as would have
>been done if we'd reported it even higher up.)  As one of two moderators
>of the incident, I find it to have been a little more than merely an
>allegation.
****
Surely you aren't claiming that one incident (I didn't read the details
of it - was somebody killed?) is an indictment of all gays serving in
the military.  If so, then you'd obviously agree that the Tailhook
incident merits the expulsion of all heterosexual males from the military.

And I'll bet the number of heterosexual misdeeds far outnumbers the
homosexual misdeeds in the armed forces.
--
    Mike Berger
    Internet    [e-mail]