home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rutgers!rochester!cornell!uw-beaver!greg
- From: greg@cs.washington.edu (Greg Barnes)
- Newsgroups: alt.quotations
- Subject: Re: Twain on Jane Austen
- Message-ID: <1993Jan1.143801.14339@beaver.cs.washington.edu>
- Date: 1 Jan 93 14:38:01 GMT
- References: <1hvs94INNp2j@early-bird.think.com> <1993Jan1.024945.22607@syacus.acus.oz.au> <C05suE.Es4@world.std.com>
- Sender: news@beaver.cs.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Judy Vickery Fan Club, Saarbr\"ucken Chapter
- Lines: 56
-
- In article <C05suE.Es4@world.std.com> mgm@world.std.com (michael g moncur)
- writes:
- >>dave mankins (dm@think.com) wrote:
- >>> ``No library is complete that contains the works of Jane Austen.''
- >>> - Mark Twain
- >
- >If you'll pardon the correction:
- >
- >"Just the omission of Jane Austen's books alone would make a fairly
- > good library out of a library that hadn't a book in it."
- > - Mark Twain (1835-1910)
-
- Michael's version, while it may not be completely correct, is probably nearer
- the truth.
-
- As for the burgeoning Twain/Austen war, I will say that while much of
- Twain's nonfiction is hilarious, some of it is pretty stupid. Try
- his essay on why Bacon wrote Shakespeare's plays, or any of his essays
- on determinism. Egad.
-
- On the whole, Austen can be very insightful, clever, and delightfully
- ironic, but she has her own faults, which include a similarity of plots and
- a predilection for characters that sit around and talk but do nothing.
-
- I enclose the following quotes, which, in my mind, make up for
- any boredom I have endured or will endure reading the works of these great
- authors:
-
- It was rather too late in the day to set about being simple-minded
- and ignorant.
- --- Jane Austen, "Emma"
- -----------------------------------------------------------
- A Plan for the Improvement of English Spelling
-
- For example, in Year 1 that useless letter "c" would be dropped to be
- replased either by "k" or "s", and likewise "x" would no longer be part
- of the alphabet. The only kase in which "c" would be retained would be
- the "ch" formation, which will be dealt with later. Year 2 might reform
- "w" spelling, so that "which" and "one" would take the same konsonant,
- wile Year 3 might well abolish "y" replasing it with "i" and Iear 4 might
- fiks the "g/j" anomali wonse and for all. Jenerally, then, the
- improvement would kontinue iear bai iear with Iear 5 doing awai with
- useless double konsonants, and Iears 6-12 or so modifaiing vowlz and the
- rimeining voist and unvoist konsonants. Bai Iear 15 or sou, it wud
- fainali bi posibl tu meik ius ov thi ridandant letez "c", "y" and "x"
- -- bai now jast a memori in the maindz ov ould doderez -- tu riplais
- "ch", "sh", and "th" rispektivli. Fainali, xen, aafte sam 20 iers ov
- orxogrefkl riform, wi wud hev a lojikl, kohirnt speling in ius xrewawt
- xe Ingliy-spiking werld.
- --- Mark Twain
-
- I leave it to other to defend James Fenimore Cooper and the Bronte sisters.
- For extra credit, tell us why Anne Bronte was a great author. But please,
- do it in rec.arts.books.
- --------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Greg Barnes greg@cs.washington.edu barnes@mpi-sb.mpg.de
-