home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!darwin.sura.net!spool.mu.edu!think.com!enterpoop.mit.edu!eru.mt.luth.se!lunic!sunic!aun.uninett.no!nuug!ifi.uio.no!nntp.uio.no!ulrik!haavardf
- From: haavardf@boson.uio.no (Haavard Fosseng)
- Newsgroups: alt.quotations
- Subject: Re: Slick Willie
- Message-ID: <HAAVARDF.92Dec22213528@boson.uio.no>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 20:35:28 GMT
- References: <1992Dec22.015808.5831@quantime.co.uk> <1h7k8dINNrij@travis.csd.harris.com>
- Sender: news@ulrik.uio.no (Mr News)
- Organization: University of Oslo, Norway
- Lines: 29
- In-Reply-To: kbeal@amber's message of 22 Dec 1992 17:45:49 GMT
- Nntp-Posting-Host: boson.uio.no
-
- In article <1h7k8dINNrij@travis.csd.harris.com> kbeal@amber (Ken Beal) writes:
-
- I'd like to take exception to this, as well as Asimov's quote from his
- _Foundation_ series that:
-
- "Violence is the last refuge of the incompetent."
-
- While they >sound< great, they are both grammatically incorrect (or, I am
- reading the wrong thing into them, which could be the case but I doubt it).
-
- If X was the "last refuge" of Y, then wouldn't it make sense that Y would
- try >everything else< before trying X? I.e. it is their "last resort," as
- it were? This would be giving Y much more credit than Y deserves (i.e.
- the quotes are trying to show that Y is wrong/a fool/an idiot, and my
- grammatical interpretation of them shows that Y will exhaust all options
- before trying X).
-
- It would be much better worded "X is the first refuge of Y", would it not?
-
- Just a thought.
-
- I seem to remember that Amborce Bierce said something along the lines of:
-
- According to dr. Johnson, patriotism is the last refuge of the scoudrel.
- With all due respect to an earlier bu inferior lexicographer, I beg to
- submit that it is the first.
-
-
- H}vard Fosseng
-