home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.peeves
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!umn.edu!csus.edu!netcom.com!obrien
- From: obrien@netcom.com (Robert O'Brien)
- Subject: Re: A Definite Not-Peeve, involves money
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.044303.2116@netcom.com>
- Organization: Netcom Online Communications Services (408-241-9760 login: guest)
- References: <1992Dec17.042804.15837@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 04:43:03 GMT
- Lines: 24
-
- In article <1992Dec17.042804.15837@mnemosyne.cs.du.edu> bberbeni@nyx.cs.du.edu (Bill Berbenich) writes:
- >There is a definite Not-Peeve/Anti-Peeve coming down the pike and it involves
- >a substantial chunk of change (money, for the jargonally-impaired). No hints
- >yet, but it looks big. BIG big.
- >
- >Details as they become known, but there are no acts of perversion involved
- >in this thing as far as I know (or can recall).
- >
- >Life is definitely good! I am so excited I can hardly stand it.
- >xxxFx.fkl
- >CARRIER LOST
- >--
- >Lost .sig: Reward if returned unharmed. e-mail me for details. some
- > restrictions apply.
-
-
- Gee, I got one of those 'finalist' letters from Publisher's Clearing House, too!
-
-
- ObPeeve: So did my grandmother, who took it far more seriously than
- she should - thinking maybe she had a 1:1000 chance or so...
-
- Bob O'Bob
- --
-