home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.magick
- Path: sparky!uunet!think.com!rpi!usenet.coe.montana.edu!news.u.washington.edu!cpac.washington.edu!joshua
- From: joshua@cpac.washington.edu (Joshua Geller)
- Subject: Re: pentagrams and sepher sephirot
- In-Reply-To: sirbyte@brewich.hou.tx.us's message of Sun, 20 Dec 92 14:31:28 CST
- Message-ID: <JOSHUA.92Dec21014809@bailey.cpac.washington.edu>
- Sender: news@u.washington.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Institute for the Study of Ancient Science
- References: <1992Dec19.153551.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- <6iL4VB6w165w@brewich.hou.tx.us>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 09:48:09 GMT
- Lines: 15
-
-
- In article <6iL4VB6w165w@brewich.hou.tx.us> sirbyte@brewich.hou.tx.us (William
- hancock) writes:
-
- > dpschneider@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
- > > Well its just a thought... but now I have a question. In "Sepher Sephiro
- > > it is clear that at times Crowley does not use the numerical attributions
- > >of the final letters.
-
- neither do jewish qabalists, as a general rule.
-
- the finals are a late development in the alphabet.
-
-
- josh
-