home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.warlord
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!torn!nott!cunews!revcan!geovision!pt
- From: pt@geovision.gvc.com (Paul Tomblin)
- Subject: Re: RUSH?
- Message-ID: <BzL1zE.A87@geovision.gvc.com>
- Reply-To: pt@geovision.gvc.com
- Organization: Not officially GeoVision Systems Inc., Ottawa, Ontario
- References: <1992Dec17.001118.29516@tc.cornell.edu> <1992Dec16.203322.514@doug.cae.wisc.edu> <BzDysy.KHC@unix.portal.com> <1992Dec17.194415.15433@galileo.cc.rochester.edu>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 00:14:00 GMT
- Lines: 13
-
- cw001b@uhura.cc.rochester.edu (Cristobal Weinholz) writes:
- >In <BzDysy.KHC@unix.portal.com> rivit@shell.portal.com (Russell Michael VanTassell) writes:
- >>In article <1992Dec16.203322.514@doug.cae.wisc.edu> saunders@luther.che.wisc.edu (Brian E. Saunders) writes:
- [more rush crap than I care to mention]
-
- Matt! Why do I have the feeling that this is going to stay in a.f.w and
- mutate - the way 'Re: Bigfootf Spaceman' did in alt.religion.kibology?
-
- Is it because I think Rush fans are as clueless as the readers of
- alt.alien.visitors?
-
- --
- Paul Tomblin, as if you didn't know...
-