home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.fan.rush-limbaugh
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!uncle!jcnpc!mam
- From: mam@jcnpc.cmhnet.org (Mike A. McAngus)
- Subject: Re: Soul of the Republican Party
- Message-ID: <1992Dec27.180127.5333@jcnpc.cmhnet.org>
- Organization: Homebrew Virtual Reality Labs
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL6]
- References: <dlhanson.47@nap.amoco.com>
- Date: Sun, 27 Dec 1992 18:01:27 GMT
- Lines: 199
-
- David L. Hanson (dlhanson@nap.amoco.com) wrote:
- : In article <0JoBwB4w165w@unkaphaed.gbdata.com> popec@unkaphaed.gbdata.com (Wi
- lliam C. Barwell) writes:
- :
- : >There aint any such clause. However. Thomas Jefferson and James
- : >Madison were the fathers of the first amendment. In a letter to a group
- : >of Babtists, the Danbury Babtists, jefferson uses the phrase "Wall of
- : >seperation". He makes it very clear that there is to be a STRONG wall of
- : >seperation between Church and State.
- :
- : The State he was talking about was the federal goverment, not state
- : governments, as will shown below.
-
- Even if your point is granted, the Fourteenth Amendment makes the U.S.
- Constitution the supreme law even in the States.
-
- :
- : >When Jefferson was president, one Rev. Millar, wrote to ask him to
- : >institue an oficial day of prayer, which Jefferson refused. Rev. Millar
- : >then wrote again to ask him to institute an UNOFFICAL day of prayer,
- : >which Jefferson pointedly refused.
- :
- : Are you sure what Miller was writing about?
- : According to "The Myth of Separation" by David Barton, page 41:
- :
- : "Most people are suprised when they find that the Constitution does not
- : contain the words 'separation of church and state.'
-
- Many people I've talked to have been surprised that "God", "In God We Trust",
- "One Nation Under God", and "Life, Liberty and the Pusuit of Happiness" are
- also not contained in the Constitution. This only shows that many people have
- not bothered to read the entire document.
-
- : The common perception
- : is that those words are the heart of the First Amendment and are included
- : in it. Since that phrase does not appear in the our Constitution, what is
- : its origin?
- :
- : At the time of the Constitution, although the states encourage Christianity,
- : no state allowed an exclusive state-sponsored denomination. However,
- : many citizens did recall accounts from earlier years when one denomination
- : ruled over and oppressed all others. Even though these past abused were
- : not current history in 1802, the fear of a recurrences still lingered
- : in some minds.
- :
- : It was in this context that the Danbury Baptist Association of Danbury,
- : Connecticut, wrote to President Jefferson. Although the statesman and
- : patriots who framed the Constitution made it clear that no one Christian
- : denomination would become the official denomination, the Baptists expressed
- : their concern over a rumor that a particular denomination was soon to be
- : recognized as the national denomination. On January 1, 1802, President
- : Jefferson responded to the Danbury Baptists in a letter. He calmed their
- : fears by using the now infamous phrase to assure them that the federal
- : government would notestablish any single denomination of Christianity as the
- : national denomination:
- :
- : I contemplate with solemn reverence that act of the whole American
- : people which declared that their legislature should 'make no law
- : respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free
- : exercise thereof,' thus building a wall of separtion between Church
- : and State.
- : ...
- : The 'wall' was originally introduced as, and understood to be a
- : one-directional wall protecting the church from the government.
-
- Many Christians have made this statement to me, but none have been able to
- support this contention. What, in Jefferson's writings, states that this wall
- is "a one-directional wall"? I submit that such a concept would have been
- non-sense in the late 18th and early 19th centuries.
-
- : This was
- : also Jefferson's understanding, as conveyed through statements he made
- : concerning the First Amendment - statements now ignored by the Court:
- :
- : Kentucky Resolutions of 1798: No power over the freedom of religion...
- : [is] delegated to the United States by the Constitution.
- :
- : Second Inaugural Address, 1805: In matters of religion I have considered
- : that its free exercise is placed by the Constitution independent ofthe
- : powers of the General [federal government].
- :
- : Letter to Samuel Miller, 1808: I consider the government of the
- : United States as interdicted by the Constitution from intermeddling with
- : religions institutions, their doctrines, discipline, or exercises. This
- : results not only from the provision that now law shall be made respecting
- : the establishment or free exercise of religion, but from that also which
- : reserves to the States powers not delegated to the United States [10th
- : amendment]. Certainly, no power to prescribe any religious excercise,
- : or to assume authority in religious discipline, has been delegated to
- : the General Government. IT MUST THEN REST WITH THE STATES, as far
- : as it can be in any human authority.
-
- And this sentiment is nullified by the Fourteenth Amendment so that, now, the
- Constitutional restrictions that apply to the Federal Government also apply to
- the States.
-
- :
- : Contrary to Jefferson's explanation of the intent, such power no longer
- : rests with the states. In 1947, in Everson v. Board of Educ., the Court
- : reversed 150 years of established legal practice under the Constitution and
- : decided that it did have the right to rule on an individual state's decisions
- : regarding religious practice. Prior to that reversal, the Courts have left
- : the decisions as Jefferson and all other Founders has planned it - 'rest[ing]
- : with the states.' State legislatures had been passing laws since the 1600's
- : allowing the free exercise of religious practices in schools and public
- : affairs: voluntary prayer, Bible reading, the use of the Ten Commandments,
- : etc. These laws had been enacted 'with the consent of the governed' and
- : through representatives elected 'of the people, by the people, and for
- : the people'. "
- :
- : > "I consider the government of the United States as interdicted by the
- : >Constitution from meddlim=ng with reigous institutions, their doctrines,
- : >discipline or exercises. This rresults not only from the provision that
- : >no law shall be made respecting the establishment, or free exercise of
- : >religion,....
- : > But it is only proposed that I recommend not prescribe a day of fasting
- : >and prayer. That is, I should indirectly assume to the United States an
- : >authority over religous exercises, which the Constitution has directly
- : >precluded them from..."
- :
- : >You could imagine what Jefferson would say about prayer in public
- : >schools, or Creches on government property, or what he would say about
- : >the pious legeal frauds that declare such creches as 'secular' rather
- : >than religous as some courts have done.
- :
- : Jefferson would have been perfectly happy with voluntary prayer in
- : public schools. You draw the wrong conclusions from his statement to
- : Mr. Miller, because you left off the part where Jefferson says that
- : powers to prescribe voluntary prayer 'rest with the States'.
- :
- : >Remember, Jefferson was one of the two men most responsible for there
- : >being a first amandment, and actually wrote the final version of that
- : >amendment. HE definitly is the one person that knows what it meant and
- : >how strongly it was to apply.
- :
- : Not true! According to Barton's book:
- :
- : "Jefferson did NOT play a leading role either in the First Amendment or the
- : Constitution; he had been in Paris. In fact, during the Congressional
- : debate, it was Fisher Ames of Massachusetts who proposed the wording of
- : the First Amendment; and it was the conference committee of Senators Oliver
- : Ellsworth, Charles Carroll, and William Paterson and Representatives Roger
- : Sherman, John Vining, and James Madison which hammered out the final wording
- : that the Congress subsequently approved and the states finally ratified.
- : Jefferson was NOT present.
- :
- : Even though Jefferson did NOT participate in the framing of the First
- : Amendment,..."
- :
- : The Court portrays Madison and Jefferson as being opposed en toto to
- : permitting any religious influence on government or public affairs.
- : However, such is not the case, as shown by Jefferson's actions"
- :
- : While serving in the Virginia Assembly he ws the one who personally
- : introduced a resolution for a Day of Fasting and Prayer in 1774...
- : When he established the University of Virginia, he encouraged the
- : teaching of religion and set apart space in the Rotunda for chapel
- : services. He also praised the use of the local courthouse in his home
- : town for religious services.
- :
- : Actually, while President of the United States, Jefferson also became first
- : president of the Washington, D.C. public school board, which used the
- : Bible and Watt's Hymnal as reading texts in the classroom - well subsequent
- : to the adoption of the First Amendment. According to Jefferson:
- :
- : I have always said, and always will say, that the studious perusal of
- : the sacred volume will make us better citizens.
- : ...
- :
- : In his 'Notes on the State of Virginia', Jefferson declared:
- :
- : And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed
- : their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these
- : liberties are of the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but
- : with His wrath? Indeed I tremble for my country when I reflect that God
- : is just; that his justice cannot sleep forever."
- :
- : >If anything, the first amendment has definitely been stepped on by our
- : >politicians in the last half century. Putting in 'God we trust" on our
- : >dollars....
- :
- : >We need to go back to following the Constitution, not subverting it for
- : >the benifit of right winged evangelicals and the like.
- :
- : The first amendment has only been "stepped on" in this century by the
- : enemies of the Lord and Saviour Jesus Christ. Liberals, both on and
- : off of the Court, are rewriting history and fooling most of the people
- : with their lies. They are doing this through their control of
- : the public socialist [school] system which is a tool of the socialist
- : left used to corrupt the minds of the youth of this country.
-
- Talk about sweeping generalizations! Up to this point I thought Mr. Hanson's
- arguments were reasonable. But here, at the end, he blows it by making ad
- hominem arguments with no substance.
- --
- Mike McAngus | As if I needed Another time consuming hobby.
- (mam@jcnpc.cmhnet.org) |
- The Truth is still the Truth | This Post exploits illiterates.
- Even if you choose to ignore it. |
-