home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.dads-rights:3085 alt.child-support:4036
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!malgudi.oar.net!hyperion!desire.wright.edu!sbishop
- From: sbishop@desire.wright.edu
- Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights,alt.child-support
- Subject: Re: Itemized accounting of child support
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.213544.6339@desire.wright.edu>
- Date: 22 Dec 92 21:35:44 EST
- References: <1h0k4aINN32a@gap.caltech.edu> <1992Dec20.085201.6296@desire.wright.edu> <BzMDI4.Fvt@cs.psu.edu> <1992Dec22.122810.9101@ll.mit.edu>
- Organization: Wright State University
- Lines: 81
-
- In article <1992Dec22.122810.9101@ll.mit.edu>, yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich) writes:
- > In article <BzMDI4.Fvt@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >>In article <1992Dec20.085201.6296@desire.wright.edu> sbishop@desire.wright.edu writes:
- >>>{_In article <1h0k4aINN32a@gap.caltech.edu>, peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >>>> karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
- >>
- >>>> This would not allow the CP to save any of the chilld support for college!
- >>>> Actually, depending on how you define "immediately", it may disallow the
- >>>> CP from salting away money for child-related emergencies, or Christmas
- >>>> presents, or a bicycle, etc.
- >>>
- >>>Ah, but Michal, both Alan and Bob consider anything except money paid for
- >>>immediate basic minimal needs as luxury! So, salting money away for a
- >>>bicycle (an HUGE luxury item in their eyes), or *gasp* college is a waste
- >>>of THEIR precious funds.
- >>
- >>Who's Bob?
- >>
- >>
- >>>And, yes, this is a flame. And, yes, this is a fairly accurate description
- >>>of their position.
- >>
- >>"Fairly accurate?" Apart from your inability to distinguish
- >>three-letter names... Child-related emergencies can be covered
- >>by insurance (provided by the NCP!) -- or will you now say that
- >>a CP might have to buy an emergency bicycle or pony or condo in Florida?
- >>
- >>
- >>In Pennsylvania, a NCP is not obligated to pay for college.
- >>Thus, even the *law*, which you so religiously like to invoke,
- >>says that college is not a basic need.
- >>
- >>There should be no LEGAL obligation to pay for college or to
- >>pay child support that includes money to be saved for college.
- >>Married parents are not legally required to pay for college.
- >>
- >>Are you going to pay for your foster son's college education
- >>all by yourselves, Sue?
- >
- >
- > Of couese not! She only proudly raises kids that *other*
- > people pay for. That's why she argues the side she does;
- > don't want to see those checks interrupted.`
-
- I also proudly raise my OWN kids. It seems that you never read any
- thing I post, yet start yelling from an area of ignorance. I have
- two birth children besides Mike. I don't see you taking in any extra
- children in addition to your own. Oh, yes, you don't even allow your
- own kids to visit, even when they ask to see you....
-
-
- >
- > But I don't see her chasing after the MOTHER, who she
- > claims ALSO has support obligations. And I don't see
- > her answering MY question(s) about why it isn't time
- > to start putting the "squeeze" on the MOTHER as well
- > as this kids FATHER.
- >
-
- I have answered this several times. I have NO control over the process
- of support obligations, this is handled through the court. And I have
- also (SEVERAL TIMES) told you that the mother is mentally ill, in and
- out of mental hospitals and on welfare.
-
-
- > Funny how she spends all her time telling us that we don't
- > answer her questions, and she ignores ours.
- >
-
- Funny how you don't seem to be able to remember previous information, even
- when it is posted several times.
-
- >
- >
- > --
- > Alan Yasutovich
- > "inquiring (and nosey) minds WANT TO KNOW!!!"
- > I can remember when "safe sex" meant having a padded headboard!!
- > Tick Tock.....Tick Tock......Tick Tock .....Tick Tock......
-
- Sue
-