home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky alt.dads-rights:3080 alt.child-support:4034
- Newsgroups: alt.dads-rights,alt.child-support
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uwm.edu!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
- From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
- Subject: Re: Itemized accounting of child support
- Message-ID: <BzoHAx.4vH@cs.psu.edu>
- Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
- Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
- References: <1992Dec20.085201.6296@desire.wright.edu> <BzMDI4.Fvt@cs.psu.edu> <1992Dec22.122810.9101@ll.mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 1992 20:37:45 GMT
- Lines: 43
-
- In article <1992Dec22.122810.9101@ll.mit.edu> yasu@ll.mit.edu (Alan Yasutovich) writes:
- >In article <BzMDI4.Fvt@cs.psu.edu> beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver) writes:
- >>In article <1992Dec20.085201.6296@desire.wright.edu> sbishop@desire.wright.edu writes:
- >>>{_In article <1h0k4aINN32a@gap.caltech.edu>, peri@cco.caltech.edu (Michal Leah Peri) writes:
- >>>> karl@ddsw1.mcs.com (Karl Denninger) writes:
- >>
- >>>> This would not allow the CP to save any of the chilld support for college!
- >>>> Actually, depending on how you define "immediately", it may disallow the
- >>>> CP from salting away money for child-related emergencies, or Christmas
- >>>> presents, or a bicycle, etc.
- >>>
- >>>Ah, but Michal, both Alan and Bob consider anything except money paid for
- >>>immediate basic minimal needs as luxury! So, salting money away for a
- >>>bicycle (an HUGE luxury item in their eyes), or *gasp* college is a waste
- >>>of THEIR precious funds.
-
- >>>And, yes, this is a flame. And, yes, this is a fairly accurate description
- >>>of their position.
-
- And, yes, Sue Bishop said she is NOT salting ANY money away
- for "*gasp* college."
-
- God forbid I mention that she IS taking her foster son
- with the family on vacation in Florida.
-
- I support her every right to do whatever she wants with her
- OWN money, though.
-
-
- > But I don't see her chasing after the MOTHER, who she
- > claims ALSO has support obligations. And I don't see
- > her answering MY question(s) about why it isn't time
- > to start putting the "squeeze" on the MOTHER as well
- > as this kids FATHER.
-
- Sue Bishop mentioned that the mother has some mental problems --
- but Sue's description of the father seems to indicate the same. So
- I guess he'd have to commit himself to an institution to avoid paying --
- although I'd bet he'd be in arrears anyway, when he came out.
-
- Don
- --
- beaver@cs.psu.edu Opinions from the PC-challenged
-