>>> 8) One source that you may want to use for your research is "Aviation Week and> Space Technology". This weekly industry journal has reported every shuttle> flight in great detail. They go to great lengths to find and report on
>>> secret or classified data. You will find not a hint about the secret flight.
>>>
>>> THEY ARE EITHER IGNORANT THEMSELVES, OR AFRAID TO SAY ANYTHING.
>>
>>Umm -- have you ever read it? If so, you'd know that neither alternative
>>makes any sense at all.
>>
>
>Yes, I have read it. I see nothing to preclude the above possibilities. You
>know, if Av Week were half as good as what some people think they are regarding
>revelation of truly sensitive and classified projects, they would be regarded as
>security leaks by the Federal Government, and no doubt they would be having a
>lot more problems than they are. As it is, the stuff they reveal is child's
>play compared to what is really going/has gone on.
Hence *I* ask, have you been meeting with the lemurs to get this information?
>>To be fair, I should answer the same question. I'll find your story credible
>>if any of a number of things happen. (a) Someone publicly demonstrates any
>>one of the technological miracles you've described (cosmospheres, electro-
>>gravitic whatsits, cloned or otherwise-replicated people, etc.) (b) an
>>official who was involved in the coverup or the plot admits it publicly,
>>and produces some documentary evidence. (c) the release, via the Freedom
>>of Information Acts, of substantive documentation of any of this; (d) photos,
>>from a lunar orbiter, of (the wreckage of?) military bases on the moon.
>
>I do not make a habit of rejecting real evidence. I am just aware of various
>techniques used by cover-up artists to put forth falsified evidence of what
>they want the public to believe. They know well that "seeing is believing",
>and plausible evidence such as that is usually enough to convince most people,
>who will not search deeper and ask questions about what they see.
>
>As for genetic replicas, you may want to read the old standby Future Shock by
>Alvin Toffler (1970, Random House), the Dynamics of Change by Kaiser Aluminum
>and Chemical Corporation (1967, Prentice-Hall), and The Biological Time Bomb
>by Gordon R. Taylor (1968, The New American Library).
>
>I agree. I'm sure it's just another story cooked up to distract us from
>the real issues.
>
>To me, there are just too many inconsistencies in STS-1 to just brush them
>off as nonsense or ravings. They have never been addressed at all by
>anyone on this newsgroup, and I think they warrant a serious investigation.
>Will they ever be addressed?
The lemurs, which control the net directly and indirectly, through
powerful MIND CONTROL SOFTWARE (codenamed "frink"), are manipulating YOU,
Mr. Volkoff, into distracting the public from the REAL TRUTH with this
story made up of HALF TRUTHS and GARBAGE
I have LEARNED the TRUTH. The TRUTH is that Heinlein, Simak, Asimov, and
Leiber, famous science fiction and fantasy WRITERS who "died" in recent
years, did not DIE at ALL but rather were TAKEN CAPTIVE by the lemur
puppet masters and put to WORK generating these PREPOSTEROUS stories which
you then promulgate as FACT.
We are ON to you, Mr. Volkoff. You are doing good work for your MASTERS
