home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.callahans
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!umn.edu!umeecs!quip.eecs.umich.edu!bshsiung
- From: bshsiung@quip.eecs.umich.edu (Bernard Hsiung)
- Subject: Re: Utopiae (Was: Amanda wants to be a Kesh)
- Message-ID: <1992Dec23.191412.25753@zip.eecs.umich.edu>
- Sender: news@zip.eecs.umich.edu (Mr. News)
- Organization: University of Michigan EECS Dept., Ann Arbor, MI
- References: <1giqdrINN64c@newsman.csu.murdoch.edu.au> <105064@bu.edu> <1gnpu4INNl38@JAGUAR.ZOO.CS.YALE.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 23 Dec 1992 19:14:12 GMT
- Lines: 41
-
- lower-tony@cs.yale.edu (Tony Lower) writes:
- > Manx suddenly perks up. "And for another comment... this is an example
- >of my favorite quote" (which I can't remember who said, and like that,
- >so I'm not going to attribute it! so there!)
- >
- > "The opposite of a simple truth is a falsehood. The opposite of a
- >profound truth is another profound truth."
-
- Hi, Manx! I think it was Niels Bohr (the physicist) who said that.
-
- On the subject of utopia, I think the optimal form of government is a
- benevolent dictatorship, but let me say (before y'all rush out to toss
- stuff at me *grin*) that I'm very well aware of the problems...
-
- Who gets to be dictator? An infinitely benevolent, omnipotent, omniscient
- God seems to me to be the best choice (almost by definition). Unfortunately,
- God is MIA or otherwise not available for comment at the moment. (Or at
- least, interpreting what said God wants is left to us humans, who are not
- exactly in agreement on the subject.)
-
- Thus, we're stuck with second best. For me, second best _is_ me.
- Of course, I recognize respectfully that most people would disagree
- vehemently that I would be _their_ second best choice. *smile*
-
- Furthermore, even if a compromise could be made on dictator, how does one
- ensure benevolence once the dictatorship is established? (Assuming, of
- course, that the dictator is someone besides me; I think I can count on
- myself to strive to keep myself happy.) I don't think it's possible.
-
- From a more practical standpoint (or at least one which I can implement
- here and now with what I have), I feel that the statement "'An you harm
- no one, do as thou wilt shall be the whole of the law" pretty much sums
- up my (current) approach to life. I won't make any more general comments,
- since I also strongly believe that each person has to find the way that
- works for him or her (and there's no reason on earth that their approaches
- would have or should have to be the same as mine).
-
- Just my two cents. *grin*
-
- --
- Jedi Squire-in-Training (Bernard Hsiung, bshsiung@eecs.umich.edu)
-