home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!menudo.uh.edu!cl2.cl.uh.edu!byers
- From: byers@cl2.cl.uh.edu (Unbeliever)
- Newsgroups: alt.callahans
- Subject: Bowls of Alpha-Bits, and the Great Swiss Cheese
- Date: 21 Dec 1992 08:53 CST
- Organization: The Land
- Lines: 180
- Distribution: world
- Message-ID: <21DEC199208532367@cl2.cl.uh.edu>
- Reply-To: byers@cl.uh.edu
- NNTP-Posting-Host: uhcl2.cl.uh.edu
- News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.4-b1
-
- The Unbeliever hangs his head in shame; he is guilty of reviving a dying topic
- that had already been beaten to death several times. But... what the hell.
- It's one of his favorite subjects of discussion!
-
- Unbe catches a fragment of a conversation the seems to have stemmed directly
- from his words...
-
- >..."very few people will base their actions on the advice of a
- >bowl of Alpha-Bits, however learned a cereal that may be. :-)"
-
- ..and promptly falls off his stool, laughing harder than he has in quite
- awhile. After recovering from his laughing fit, he resolves to start listening
- more carefully.
-
-
-
- Unbe turnes to face Michael Schiffer as he says:
-
- > "I'm inclined to doubt it. If animal species were directly
- >created, the universe seems to have been designed to be misleading.
- >Which would be a reasonable hypothesis if the scientific creationists
- >were Gnostics, but just doesn't work with their predominantly
- >Christian beliefs. They might be able to make a consistent hypothesis
- >by presuming some sort of diabolic deception,
-
- Unbe cuts in, saying, "That is EXACTLY what I've heard some of these
- Fundamentalist Christians claim: that God intentionally planted misleading
- fossil evidence in the Earth's crust, to weed out those who place more trust in
- their own minds than in the Word of God. I'm sorry, but if God is trying to
- mislead us, well, then, gosh, we might as well give up now and go completely
- insane. Hear me, God? You win! You're GOD; I certainly can't compete.
- Guess you got us beat! No loss of face there, losing a war of wits with a
- being who created your mind without working up a sweat. Needless to say, I
- prefer to believe in a God who, having given us intelligence, wants us to USE
- it rather than disregard it."
-
- "I'm sorry for interrupting. Please continue! :)"
-
-
-
- >but in that case they
- >can't be _scientific_ creationists, since the scientific data are
- >suspect. Whereas all the scientific creation literature I've read (I
- >had a friend who was a creationist back in high school, so I got the
- >chance to look at some of it) is just bad science-- deliberate
- >misconstructions of evidence, ignorance of recent data, and very often
- >a fallacy of the excluded middle plus other elementary logical flaws:
- >i.e. concluding that since current evolutionary theories fail to explain x, no
- >evolutionary theory can be correct and that therefore some version of
- >Biblical creationism must be correct. Which strikes me as much like
- >saying that since relativity and quantum theory have some problems
- >being reconciled, the only possibility is Aristotelian physics.
-
- Unbeliever is beaming as he listens to this. "Poetry, sheer poetry.", he
- remarks. "Michael S. Schiffer, yours is a truly remarkable mind. I completely
- agree with everything you say."
-
- Unbeliever grins even wider, as he realizes just how that remark came out. But
- he doesn't let it stop him from continuing his oration.
-
- "Valid logic is one of the greatest triumphs of the human mind. And invalid
- logic is one of the greatest disasters. NOBODY does as much harm as he who
- presents nonsense as if it were valid logic. In your example above, the
- Creationist is reasoning:"
-
- "1) ASSUMPTION: Either the current model of Evolution is completely true,
- or it is completely false."
-
- "2) ASSUMPTION: If Evolution is false, Creationism must be true."
-
- "3) FACT: Evolution currently does not explain certain observations."
-
- "4) THEREFORE: Evolution is completely false."
-
- "5) THEREFORE: Creationism must be true."
-
-
- "Now the REASONING looks good. Given those assumptions, the conclusion is
- indeed proven. But LOOK AT THOSE ASSUMPTIONS! Assumption 1 says that
- scientists must have the complete answer now. No room for learning anything
- new about evolution later; either evolution explains everything now or it is
- completely wrong. Assumption 2 says that there are only two possible origins
- of the world: Evolution, and Creationism, where Creationism is defined as the
- Christian God creating the world precisely as his 'diary' (the Bible), states.
- By that assumption, they very conveniently do away with every other religion,
- as well as any other scientific theory of the world's origin. Before the
- logical argument ever begins, they make assumptions that insure that they will
- 'win'. Naturally, these assumptions are NEVER stated aloud. They are
- 'assumed', and the Creationist simply begins the argument with statement 3
- above. Very convenient. Lets turn the tables:"
-
- "1) ASSUMPTION: Either the current model of Creationism is completely true,
- or it is completely false."
-
- "2) ASSUMPTION: If Creationism is false, Evolution must be true."
-
- "3) FACT: Creationism currently does not explain certain observations
- (namely, the preponderence of evidence for evolution)."
-
- "4) THEREFORE: Creationism is completely false."
-
- "5) THEREFORE: Evolution must be true."
-
- "You know, Creationists get VERY upset when you do this sort of thing to them.
- They get all red and puffy, and start making incoherent noises. It's really
- quite entertaining..."
-
-
-
- >...But, granting the premise that
- >all religions (and nonreligious beliefs in a supernatural) are wholly
- >false, it is correct to view them as equivalent to searching through
- >randomness for meaning. I don't question the logic, any more than I
- >questioned the Unbeliever's right to wish for religion to cease to be.
- >But I just wanted to clarify that all of his statements had that
- >implicit premise.
-
- The Unbeliever's brow furrows as he ponders Michael's most recent words.
-
- "I don't believe I've made the assumption that all religions and supernatural
- beliefs are wholly false. My assumption is that no deity or supernatural force
- has exerted any influence on us since the advent of the Big Bang. Anything
- that occurs in our perceptible universe, is explainable through science. If
- the Great Swiss Cheese created the universe so that rodents on a small
- blue-green planet may nibble on cheese and contemplate their tails, fine. But
- SINCE the Big Bang, things have proceeded in a fashion that can be explained
- WITHOUT resorting to 'The Swiss Cheese Did It'. Deities and Supernatural
- forces are not required to explain events since the Big Bang; this doesn't
- necessarily mean they don't exist. If course, this doesn't mean they DO exist
- either. Isn't one of Christianity's main things that God will not prove he
- exists, cause then we won't need Faith? Well, there you go. Believe in God,
- or the Great Swiss Cheese, whatever, but don't try to use these religious
- beliefs to explain the day-to-day workings of the universe. They won't wash."
-
- "Oh, and to clarify one other point: I don't necessarily wish for religion to
- cease to be. What I >DO< wish is for the various INTOLERANT religions to get a
- clue. The one thing I personally find hard to accept is the concept of a
- God/Deity/Holy Cheese who acknowledges the followers of only one religion, and
- the rest are just plain outa luck."
-
-
-
- Unbe perks up when Speaker to Minerals says:
-
- >...Since the invention of
- >science, there's been quite a bit of stuff that was formerly in the domain of
- >religion that's moved to the domain of science (e.g., planetary motions,
- >evolution [though the creationists are doing their best to keep this in the
- >realm of religion]). I can't think of anything that was ever in the domain of
- >science that religion has reappropriated.
-
- "If anything gives me hope for the future of humanity, that's it."
-
-
-
- The Unbeliever drops a dollar on the table, and takes the large, frosty eggnog
- that Mike had already set out for him.
-
- "To the human race, may we get over this petty my-religion-is-better-than-yours
- nonsense and get down to some serious peace, love, and granola. Would that I
- thought it could happen in my lifetime..."
-
- Unbe gulps his eggnog, hurls the glass into the fireplace, and heads back for
- his stool.
-
- "Oh, by the way. For the next two weeks, you may notice me moving and talking
- in extreme slow-motion. Can't be helped; I'll only be here by way of a 1200
- baud link. White Gold does have its limitations... So everyone, talk to me
- REAL SLOW, OK? Thanks..."
-
-
- Be True...
- -=*> Unbeliever <*=-
-
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- |* * * * * * Preferred Address: byers@cl.uh.edu * * * * * *|
- | * * * * * Emergency Backup Address: reed@unkaphaed.gbdata.com * * * * * |
- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
- Quote of the Day:
- Abandon the search for Truth; settle for a good fantasy.
-