home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.callahans
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!dog.ee.lbl.gov!network.ucsd.edu!munnari.oz.au!metro!news
- From: mar@physics.su.OZ.AU (David Mar)
- Subject: Re: Newbies on the March
- Message-ID: <1992Dec21.090447.8483@ucc.su.OZ.AU>
- Summary: Don'cha love it when the Subject line don't reflect the content?
- Sender: news@ucc.su.OZ.AU
- Nntp-Posting-Host: physics.su.oz.au
- Organization: School of Physics, University of Sydney, Australia
- References: <1h51lcINNpf1@newsman.csu.murdoch.edu.au>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 1992 09:04:47 GMT
- Lines: 27
-
- >Splash listens and nods. "Australia is a strange case ... weights
- >(particularly birth weights, for some peculiar reason) are _always_ quoted
- >in imperial (although the official weight is metric). Most people
- >still only know their height in feet and inches. Certainly most hardware
- >items are described in imperial measures, although that's starting to
- >change over now.
-
- Danger Mouse always seems to get messed up with discussions of measurement
- systems...
-
- "I don't know about weights. I only know my own in kilograms, nothing
- else. Most of my friends, although, seem to be extremely conversant with
- the arcane unit of 'stones', and find kilograms hard to deal with for
- human weights. I do know my height in feet/inches, but only because I've
- communicated it several times to Americans.
-
- "But I don't know where you are buying your hardware supplies, Splash!
- I buy the occasional piece of timber, and I've never seen imperial
- measures on them. They've always been marked in millimetres.
-
- "One of the worst offenders for units, though, is astronomy. Through
- sheer bloody-mindedness and inertia, I am forced to have to cope with
- anachronisms like Angstroms (where the SI nanometre is a perfectly
- sensible substitute) and to measure the size of astronomical objects
- in centimetres!"
-
- - Danger Mouse.
-