home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.bbs
- Path: sparky!uunet!murphy!jpradley!magpie!manes
- From: manes@magpie.nycenet.edu (Steve Manes)
- Subject: Re: MUD for TBBS?
- Organization: Manes and Associates, NYC
- Date: Thu, 31 Dec 1992 07:55:38 GMT
- Message-ID: <C0460r.I9n@magpie.nycenet.edu>
- X-Newsreader: TIN [version 1.1 PL7]
- References: <134.3751@uonline.com>
- Lines: 94
-
- ren_just (rjus@uonline.com) wrote:
- : manes@magpie.nycenet.edu (Steve Manes) writes:
- : : ren_just (rjus@uonline.com) wrote:
- : : : I challenged you on this before, and you came up with a less than truthful
- : : : answer. Can you please tell us exactly how much it costs to configure a
- : : : UNIX system with your "cheap" solutions.
-
- : : The cheapest way to go multiuser is with
- : : Coherent ($99) and one of the PD source code BBS distributions
- : : available at net archive sites. Bang... a multiuser BBS for less
- : : than a hundred bucks.
-
- : As this message gets longer and longer. Hate to tell you, but UNIX is my
- : favorite environment. I own ESIX as well as Coherent and would love the
- : opportunity to install a BBS for a client running on one of these two
- : platforms. I run a modified version of
- : XBBS and think it is great. Lots of power on my system and newsfeeds
- : besides. But I hate to break the news. My clients don't know what a newsfeed
- : is and could care less. The systems I design aren't message based. Sure,
- : messages get exchanged, but this is for customer support.
-
- What has this got to do with your original challenge regarding the cost
- for installing a Unix BBS vs. a multiuser DOS BBS?
-
- : Coherent and UNIX are *NOT* cheap solutions by
- : the time you factor in the learning aspect. I am really tired of the people
- : here on the net downplaying this aspect. The free software is not so free
- : as well. It costs a fair amount of time to compile and tweak these apps
- : to run.
-
- Nonsense. I'm also an online services consultant (and a commercial
- BBS developer for both DOS and Unix). One of my support contracts
- is for PBS's network of education-related BBSes, Learning Link,
- which is in the top three of education-related networks in the
- world. Here's a newsbreak for you: virtually none of the LL sysops
- are Unix mavens. Almost all are simple school teachers who wouldn't
- know 'fsck' from CHKDSK. The level of technical dialogue I have with
- most of them is "Okay, Joy, now reboot the computer." "Reboot? Huh?".
- At last November's technical symposium for all LL sysops, I wasn't
- even allowed to speak for fear of frightening them.
-
- Any well-implemented Unix BBS software will be essentially
- self-installing and self-maintaining. One of the nicer aspects of
- Unix is that because it is multitasking the software can
- periodically launch any integrity checkers, packers, purgers that
- the author can think of without requiring a moment's attention from
- the site's operator.
-
- : Issue #2. On top of the above paragraph, many offices are familiar with dBASE.
- : It is a standard and many packages import/export from it. Can you please name
- : a dBASE environment for Coherent? It doesn't exist.
-
- I think I'm safe in claiming that there are at least as many qualified
- Bourne shell programmers out there as dBASE programmers. Foxbase, a
- dBASE clone (arguably, the preference of dBASE programmers anyway)
- certainly is available for Unix. We run several Foxbase apps on Learning
- Link. In fact, we ship Foxbase to new LL sites (Syracuse WCNY/Channel 38
- and Providence, most recently). The claim is that Coherent will run 386
- COFF apps, which means that it should run Foxbase/IX too, although I've
- no direct knowledge of this.
-
- : In short, I am really tired of this attitude that we can cram UNIX down
- : someone's throat because we feel it is the hottest environment out there. I
- : could say the same about the Mac vs. DOS wars. A lot of times it doesn't
- : matter what you think the best environment is, it depends on what the client
- : has and what will be a feasible solution. I haven't found a single office
- : that has contacted me where UNIX was the best choice (and I am hoping).
-
- I don't believe I "crammed" Unix down anyone's throat, just made the
- observation that you have an uninformed negative attitude towards Unix.
- I don't care what Unix products you claim to own. Owning is neither
- experience nor knowledge. I would suggest that if you plan to
- function as a consultant in the online service area rather than
- just a reseller of TBBS that you make the effort to know what
- options are out there for your clients.
-
- I'm a firm believer in the right tool for the right job and Unix clearly
- is NOT the universal BBS operating environment. As I've already said,
- Unix is inappropriate in some applications. I've referred many, many
- clients to TBBS and Major BBS and I am, in fact, a registered TBBS owner.
- But amongst corporate and institutional clients -- those that don't
- have an overwhelming priority to look like and compete with Joey's
- Space Quark BBS down the street -- I've found that Unix more
- closely integrates with those businesses and the resources
- available to them. As essentially closed universes, multitasking
- DOS BBSes tend to be too inflexible for the kinds of apps that my
- clients typically want to offer. No, I don't want to write a
- hypertext engine or a real-time weather reporting monitor or
- an internet gateway to 'gopher' or WAIS in TDBS.
-
- --
- Stephen Manes manes@magpie.nycenet.edu
- Manes and Associates/Commontech-NoHo New York, NY, USA =o&>o
-
-