home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!spool.mu.edu!olivea!decwrl!pa.dec.com!DBSTU1.RZ.TU-BS.DE!I3150101
- From: I3150101@DBSTU1.RZ.TU-BS.DE (Benedikt Rosenau)
- Newsgroups: alt.atheism
- Subject: Re: Oops (was Omniscience)
- Message-ID: <9212211849.AA13884@inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com>
- Date: 21 Dec 92 22:22:20 GMT
- Lines: 14
- X-Received: by usenet.pa.dec.com; id AA13198; Mon, 21 Dec 92 10:49:44 -0800
- X-Received: by inet-gw-1.pa.dec.com; id AA13884; Mon, 21 Dec 92 10:49:41 -0800
- X-Received: from DBSTU1 by DBSTU1.RZ.TU-BS.DE (IBM VM SMTP V2R2)
- with BSMTP id 0511; Mon, 21 Dec 92 19:48:58 MEZ
- X-To: alt.atheism.usenet
-
- My previous post was quoted wrongly. It should have begun with:
- ...............................................................................
- >>
- >> From the definitions of my Catholic youth. Omnipotent meant being able to do
- >> absolutely everything and anything.
- >>
- >Yes, but not absolutely everything and anything for all time. It's
- >the "for all time" bit I'm asking about.
-
- No, it included all the time. Omnipotent was restricted by nothing, as
- restrictions and omnipotence (tm) do not go along.
-
- ...............................................................................
- Benedikt
-