home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: alt.activism.d
- Path: sparky!uunet!uunet.ca!geac!amaron!seachg!chrisb
- From: chrisb@seachg.uucp (Chris Blask)
- Subject: Re: A pacifist's call for conditional support for US action in Somalia
- Message-ID: <1992Dec22.162239.17450@seachg.uucp>
- Reply-To: chrisb@seachg.UUCP (Chris Blask)
- Organization: Sea Change Corporation, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada
- References: <1992Dec18.202245.6709@mont.cs.missouri.edu>
- Date: Tue, 22 Dec 92 16:22:39 GMT
- Lines: 70
-
- I'm going to do something terrible, and repost an entire article. Mr.
- Foxvog has some wonderfully written words for anyone who didn't catch them
- the first time.
-
- In article <1992Dec18.202245.6709@mont.cs.missouri.edu> dfo@tko.vtt.fi (Foxvog Douglas) writes:
-
- >I am a pacifist US citizen who has been appalled at US military
- >interventions around the world since I became politically aware in the
- >1960s. I know of the terrible things that my government has done and
- >all the ways they try to sugar coat their reasons for taking their
- >actions. So in no way am i disposed to favor US military actions.
-
- >However, i find the US intervention in Somalia to be different. There
- >are hundreds of thousands of people starving to death because small
- >groups of armed men block the provision of food to them (after stealing
- >their livestock and preventing their farming during a drought). I
- >support the protection of food convoys to the starving people.
-
- >Why did Bush do this? I would guess to look good in the history books.
-
- >Do i have some complaints about the implementation of this program?
- >Certainly. I would want the US troops to put on the blue helmets and be
- >under UN, not US control. I greatly oppose the US demanding and the UN
- >Security Council granting the right to use "any means necessary."
-
- >I would support the replacement of the US troops by troops under UN
- >control as soon as possible. When the food convoys are travelling
- >regularly in an undisturbed fashion and UN troops come in to guard
- >them, the US should get out. The US does not have the responsibility
- >or right to install a government of its choosing.
-
- >It is true that Somalia has a strategic location at the entrance to the
- >Red Sea, the sea route to/from Europe. It is well located near Saudi
- >Arabia and other oil producing states. It has former US (previously
- >Soviet) air and naval bases which could be easily restored. I would
- >oppose the US rebuilding these bases or attempting to achieve ANY
- >permanent military presence.
-
- >The publicly announced objectives and reasons for the action DO make
- >sense and are appropriate. I support them while opposing any hidden
- >agenda for a permanent US presence in the area. I would urge all others
- >who have a fully justified opposition to US military actions to take
- >similar positions.
-
- >By opposing this because of what might later occur, you loose strength.
- >Support this action while linking your support to a reasoned opposition
- >to expansion to the activities you fear and you will greatly gain
- >credibility for your positions.
-
- >I understand and sympathise with those posters who oppose this action
- >for what may be behind it or what it may be converted into (although not
- >with those who oppose it because they don't want to spend money to feed
- >people). But i ask them to look a little further and to conditionally
- >support this for what it officially is, while opposing
- >any expansion.
-
- >--
- >doug foxvog
- >dfo@tko.vtt.fi
-
- Bravo! A voice of reason (and probably the majority, American and other)!!
-
- Doug, let me personally thank you for summarizing the whole complex
- situation in such a calm and reasonable fashion, my own internal fires can
- get a little over-stoked at times.
-
- Please, folks, print this out and read it a few times. Object to bad
- things, promote good; work with us, people. Please?
-
- -chris blask
-