home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!netsys!ibmpcug!pipex!unipalm!uknet!edcastle!dcs.ed.ac.uk!cc
- From: cc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (Chris Cooke)
- Newsgroups: uk.misc
- Subject: Re: car insurance scam
- Message-ID: <CC.92Nov20115140@arran.dcs.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: 20 Nov 92 11:51:40 GMT
- References: <722097911.3647@minster.york.ac.uk> <BxyM6n.8Aw@eonsw.demon.co.uk>
- Sender: cnews@dcs.ed.ac.uk (UseNet News Admin)
- Organization: Department of Computer Science, University of Edinburgh, Scotland
- Lines: 17
- In-Reply-To: ian@eonsw.demon.co.uk's message of 19 Nov 92 10:51:58 GMT
-
- In article <BxyM6n.8Aw@eonsw.demon.co.uk> ian@eonsw.demon.co.uk (Ian Leonard) writes:
-
- On a recent TV program, it was shown that insurance companies will
- wiggle out of home theft claims if they didn't like the look of the
- locks on your windows - very worrying.
-
- I am going to write to my insurance company (sorry, my new insurance
- company) to check that in the event of a burglary, the sods will actually
- pay up. It seems to me that any house holder should do the same. Also
- check the small print in the policy for escape clauses.
-
- It seems to me that insurance is now a pointless waste of money, and should
- only be bought where it's compulsory.
- --
- -- Chris. cc@dcs.ed.ac.uk (on Janet, cc@uk.ac.ed.dcs)
-
-
-