home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wupost!emory!gatech!nscf!lakes!kalki33!system
- From: kalki33!system@lakes.trenton.sc.us
- Newsgroups: talk.origins
- Subject: Re: Probability of Evolution
- Message-ID: <yws9TB3w165w@kalki33>
- Date: Sat, 14 Nov 92 13:51:45 EST
- References: <1992Nov13.043833.1@eagle.wesleyan.edu>
- Reply-To: kalki33!system@lakes.trenton.sc.us
- Organization: Kalki's Infoline BBS, Aiken, SC, USA
- Lines: 68
-
- kmagnacca@eagle.wesleyan.edu writes:
-
- > > If there isn't a model for abiogenesis "yet", then why do supposedly
- > > reputable scientists make the premature claim that life arose from
- > > non-life? Unless a model can be shown to be correct, then it is not
- > > scientific to claim that the phenomenon occurred, is it? No one has ever
- > > seen a living organism arise from an assemblage of lifeless matter, have
- > > they?
- >
- > They're not making an unsupported assertion, it's an educated guess
- > based on the non-interference of supernatural beings. That does not
- > mean that such interference is strictly ruled out.
-
- Then why does James Watson claim:
-
- "We see not only that the laws of chemistry are sufficient for
- understanding protein structure, but also that they are consistent with
- all known hereditary phenomena.
- Complete certainty now exists among essentially all biochemists that the
- other characteristics of living organisms (for example,...the hearing
- and memory processes) will all be completely understood in terms of the
- coordinative interactions of small and large molecules."
- (Molecular Biology of the Gene, p 67)
-
- Notice he says "complete certainty".
- If abiogenesis is a characteristic of living organisms, then according
- to him, it must also be the result of such a reaction.
-
- If, as you say, abiogenesis is an only educated guess, then Watson's
- statement is exactly what we are talking about. It is a premature claim
- of complete certainty that all features of life are understandable in
- terms of chemistry. Now, Watson is a leading molecular evolutionist. For
- him to make such a claim when, according to you, abiogenesis is only an
- educated guess, is irresponsible, is it not?
-
- > Anyway, you didn't answer Dan Ashlock's challenge. If it isn't
- > scientific to state that abiogenesis occured, then why is Thompson
- > basing his argument on not only the occurence but the existence of
- > a specific model? Is this an admission that Thompson is not using
- > scientific methods?
-
- Thompson does not say that abiogenesis occurred. He does not make this
- unscientific statement. It is, though, good scientific practice to carry
- a proposed set of primordial conditions --proposed by molecular
- evolutionists themselves as an initial condition which is allegedly
- sufficient to guarantee a high probability of abiogenesis-- to its
- logical conclusion. That conclusion is that no, there is not such a high
- probability after all, given these initial conditions. Therefore, we
- await other proposed initial conditions under which abiogenesis can
- supposedly occur with high probability, knowing that, in the true spirit
- of the honest scientific quest for truth, this argument that it is
- "probable" that life would have arisen from a primordial soup through
- the action of the known laws of physics over 4 billion years or so, will
- now be abandoned.
-
- Sincerely,
- Kalki "the butcher's nightmare" Dasa
-
-
- -------------------------------------------------------
- | Don't forget to chant: Hare Krishna Hare Krishna |
- | Krishna Krishna Hare Hare |
- | Hare Rama Hare Rama |
- | Rama Rama Hare Hare |
- | |
- | Kalki's Infoline BBS Aiken, South Carolina, USA |
- | (kalki33!kalki@lakes.trenton.sc.us) |
- -------------------------------------------------------
-