home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.environment:4658 sci.environment:12840 sci.energy:5542
- Newsgroups: talk.environment,sci.environment,sci.energy
- Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!darwin.sura.net!nntp.msstate.edu!me1!rat1
- From: rat1@me1.MsState.Edu (Robert Thompson)
- Subject: Re: Notch another one up for the Greennazis
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.184902.15982@ra.msstate.edu>
- Sender: news@ra.msstate.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: me1.me.msstate.edu
- Organization: Mississippi State University
- References: <17034@umd5.umd.edu> <1992Nov17.213909.10492@michael.apple.com> <JMC.92Nov17160634@SAIL.Stanford.EDU>
- Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:49:02 GMT
- Lines: 25
-
- In article <JMC.92Nov17160634@SAIL.Stanford.EDU> jmc@cs.Stanford.EDU writes:
- >While we aren't using the plutonium in our spent fuel rods, we aren't
- >throwing it away either.
- >
- >Can any of the nuclear engineers say how much fissionable material there
- >is between the plutonium and leftover U-235 compared to the original
- >content of U-235 in the enriched uranium used as fuel?
- >--
-
- Just having finished giving a lecture on in-core fuel management, well,
- here goes:
-
- Over a reactor lifetime roughly a quarter of the total reactor
- power comes from plutonium fission. After three cycles in the
- core what comes out is something like, less than 1 weight percent
- enriched U-235, maybe 0.8 weight percent Pu-241. Pretty diffuse
- concentrations, would take considerable effort to enrich to
- weapons-grade material. Hard enough to simply recycle the Pu
- into MOX (mixed-oxide) fuel. Wish I could be more precise on the
- left-over concentrations, but I haven't had access to any decent
- depletion codes since I came back to school this fall. Anybody
- with a good commercial depletion code (CASMO/SIMULATE) could give
- you number densities and total mass.
-
- --Another environmentalist for nuclear energy--
-