home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!destroyer!news.itd.umich.edu!ajd
- From: ajd@oit.itd.umich.edu (Arthur Delano)
- Newsgroups: talk.bizarre
- Subject: Re: Today's Question.
- Followup-To: talk.politics.guns
- Date: 16 Nov 1992 22:42:54 GMT
- Organization: finchhaus
- Lines: 14
- Message-ID: <1e985eINN8ba@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu>
- References: <1992Nov15.182307.19640@asuvax.eas.asu.edu> <1e6fcdINNpo8@terminator.rs.itd.umich.edu> <1992Nov16.094555.2232@walter.cray.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: helen.oit.itd.umich.edu
-
- In article <1992Nov16.094555.2232@walter.cray.com> jcarroll@ferris.cray.com (Jeff Carroll) writes:
- >>20. In all cases a misfire is equivalent to a shot, and a _snap_ or
- >>a _non-cock_ is to be considered as a misfire.
- >
- >I am utterly confused by this.
-
- practice shooting flintlock pistols.
- to broaden your education, practice badly.
-
- AjD
- followups to rec.pets.guns
- --
- ajd@oit.itd.umich.edu
- "My words are so small that it's hard to hold on to them" - Mark Edwards
-