home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!psinntp!coopsol!gordons
- From: gordons@coopsol.com (Gordon Storga)
- Subject: Re: Late-term abortion
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.213707.29477@coopsol.com>
- Organization: Stay Awake Software
- References: <1992Nov23.040702.22855@ncsu.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 92 21:37:07 GMT
- Lines: 34
-
- <1992Nov23.040702.22855@ncsu.edu> dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) said:
- >In article <lefty-161192125641@lefty.apple.com>
- >lefty@apple.com (Lefty) writes:
- >>dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
- >
- ...
- >> I've seen no definition of "good cause", nor any statement of who would be
- >> making the determination of whether a particular "cause" is "good", or how
- >> that determination might be made.
- >>
- >> Until I see a better set of definitions here, I would support no
- >> restrictions on a woman's right to decide to end her own pregnancy.
- >
- >OK, let's use an example. Many late second-trimester abortions
- >are performed because the child is mentally retarded or physically
- >handicapped. The purpose of the abortion is to kill the child,
- >not to "terminate the pregnancy". Would you oppose restrictions
- >which would prevent a handicapped child from being purposely killed
- >during an abortion?
-
- Why does someone kill a handicapped child just to perform an abortion? I
- don't understand this situation. Perhaps you can explain it more
- accurately and in detail. I would think that somone killing handicapped
- children would be reported to the police.
-
-
- Gordon
- Pro-abortion, Pro-person, Pro-women's-rights and ex-boytoy of Susan, Muriel,
- Cathi, Nora, Jennifer, Sarah, Lynn, Diana (catwoman), Diana (Sorceress), Beth,
- "CJ", and Nadja, and married to a goddess among women, and proud of it all.
- --
- The opinions expressed are my own, and not the beliefs or opinions
- of whatever company you think I work for. So there, thhhbbbt!
- Message to Kodak: Freedom for Dan Bredy.
-