home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:49093 alt.abortion.inequity:5254 soc.women:20129 soc.men:19765 alt.feminism:4846
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!ogicse!das-news.harvard.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!garvin
- From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.abortion.inequity,soc.women,soc.men,alt.feminism
- Subject: Re: compromise
- Keywords: nyikos fails to apologize for false accusation of forgery
- Message-ID: <By3F5K.Ep6.2@cs.cmu.edu>
- Date: 22 Nov 92 01:08:01 GMT
- Article-I.D.: cs.By3F5K.Ep6.2
- References: <nyikos.722268535@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <va11wlf@rpi.edu> <1ek0efINNoro@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com>
- Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
- Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
- Lines: 50
- Nntp-Posting-Host: satan.cimds.ri.cmu.edu
-
- In article <1ek0efINNoro@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com> regard@hpsdde.sdd.hp.com (Adrienne Regard) writes:
- #You know how it happens that things are always in the last place that
- #you look for 'em? There's a reason for that. And now I gleefully
- #note to the net that I'm a gonna be gone for about a week, and will
- #probably "c"atchup all of talk.abortion when I get back, so in all
- #probablility will miss mr. phoney sweety peetie when he FINALLY
- #"gets around" to me. Now ain't that a cryin' shame..... Jim, save it
- #for me, will ya?
-
- I'll save it for you, too, even if it's a Darcyesque "You may be
- right" sort of admission such as PHoney made to me.
-
- #In article <va11wlf@rpi.edu> keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
- ##nyikos@math.scarolina.edu (Peter Nyikos) writes to
- ##-#Well, I don't know what qualifies as an apology in your eyes, but I just
- ##-#posted one in response to Susan's initial short post about my "selective
- ##-#editing".
- ##-#Adrienne is a trickier case but I'll get around to her too when
- ##-#I have a little more time.
- ##
- ##adrienne is not a "trickier" case. you accused her of
- ##forgery. your accusation was false. in fact, anyone
- ##familiar with the net knew your accusation was false
- ##when they read it, which is why i suggested you speak
- ##with your sysadmins immediately and then post an
- ##apology for your false accusation. so much time has
- ##passed since then, three weeks or more isn't it, that i
- ##am forced to conclude that your accusation was an
- ##intentional smear rather than just a stupid mistake.
- ##unfortunately for you, this incident has gone a long
- ##way to solidify your growing net.reputation.
- #
- #WHAT net.reputation!? (-:
-
- This one's been answered quite nicely.
-
- #PS, oh yea, all you talk.abortion posters that I've had entralled
- #(against your will of course) in my web of deceit for the last few
- #months, who have been posting that Peter is lacking integrity -- I
- #release you for the week. You are now free to post your OWN thoughts,
- #until I get back, and seize your minds again and force you to type
- #nasty things about mr. clue-less-big-time.
-
- I guess DODie didn't read this - he's been trying to speak for
- me. Maybe he thought that he could take control in your
- absence. He should have known that you'd grant us autonomy
- in your absence, though. Radical extremists have this thing
- about freedom.
-
- Susan
-