home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 49074 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-21  |  2.0 KB
  1. Path: sparky!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!drycas.club.cc.cmu.edu!cantaloupe.srv.cs.cmu.edu!garvin
  2. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  3. Subject: Re: Larry Margolis contacts my sysadmin
  4. Message-ID: <By3D7p.CFH.2@cs.cmu.edu>
  5. From: garvin+@cs.cmu.edu (Susan Garvin)
  6. Date: Sun, 22 Nov 1992 00:26:12 GMT
  7. Sender: news@cs.cmu.edu (Usenet News System)
  8. References: <dd11skh@rpi.edu> <1992Nov21.022031.24146@ncsu.edu> <1992Nov21.040041.21953@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
  9. Distribution: na
  10. Organization: School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon
  11. Nntp-Posting-Host: satan.cimds.ri.cmu.edu
  12. Lines: 34
  13.  
  14. In article <1992Nov21.040041.21953@cbnewsj.cb.att.com> decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
  15. #In article <1992Nov21.022031.24146@ncsu.edu>, dsholtsi@csl36h.csl.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
  16. ## I provided the proof that Larry Margolis contacted my
  17. ## sysadmins.  I'm not surprised that you're unwilling to
  18. ## accept it.
  19. #
  20. #You claimed he sent"threatening email" to your system
  21. #administrator.  I read your posting.  There was no threat.
  22. #There was imply a statement that you had cross-posted widely
  23. #and inappropriately and that you should receive a "talking
  24. #to."  Nothing about removing net access.  Nothing about sending
  25. #you to bed without your supper.  Nothing about calling your church
  26. #elders and telling the Synod about your misbehavior.  In
  27. #fact, you weren't even identified by name.
  28. #
  29. #Now you have toned down your accusation to state that Larry
  30. #contacted your system administrator.  But the disputed statement
  31. #was that he sent "threatening email."  To say that someone
  32. #threatened you is a harsh statement.  Since the email was not
  33. #threatening, you certainly do owe an apology for your
  34. #misrepresentation.
  35.  
  36. As I understand it, the Reverend's church strictly forbids
  37. the following actions:
  38.  
  39. 1.  Telling the truth.
  40. 2.  Admitting that you're lying.
  41. 3.  Providing context for quotes.
  42. 4.  Apologizing.
  43. 5.  Thinking.
  44.  
  45. Susan
  46.  
  47.  
  48.