home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!usc!rpi!cookc
- From: cookc@marcus.its.rpi.edu (rocker)
- Subject: Re: DID BUSH KILL HIS CHANCES BY NOT ATTACKING FOCA?
- Message-ID: <gr11ncm@rpi.edu>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: marcus.its.rpi.edu
- References: <1eatrrINNong@usenet.INS.CWRU.Edu> <phil.722110508@seidel> <1992Nov19.003915.23933@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu> <1992Nov19.042205.3169@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 07:12:12 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz) writes:
-
- >In article <1992Nov19.003915.23933@organpipe.uug.arizona.edu>, brian@lpl.arizona.edu (Brian Ceccarelli 602/621-9615) writes:
- >>
- >> So. That is a matter of national defense. It is not a case
- >> of murder, but rather self defense. Do you not know that killing
- >> in self defense is not murder?
-
- >A few brief points to show how the parallel cited was correct,
- >and you are in error in disagreeing with it.
-
- >The United States was not defending itself against Iraq or North
- >Viet Nam. There is an argument to be made that some United
- >States' citizens were being defended in Granada, but there is
- >some question as to whether they were truly endangered. I agree
- >that they felt they were endangered.
-
- Good grief, has everyone forgotten Panama so soon? And in the case
- of Panama, "we" were supposedly only there to make an arrest. If
- several hundred people were killed in YOUR neighborhood when the
- police came to make an arrest, don't you think you might be a tad
- upset?
-
- >Dean Kaflowitz
-
- -rocker
-