home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!newsgate.watson.ibm.com!yktnews!admin!news
- From: margoli@watson.ibm.com (Larry Margolis)
- Subject: Re: a mr. intellectual integrity thread: live by the sword...
- Sender: news@watson.ibm.com (NNTP News Poster)
- Message-ID: <1992Nov20.222504.113100@watson.ibm.com>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 22:25:04 GMT
- News-Software: IBM OS/2 PM RN (NR/2) v0.15 by O. Vishnepolsky and R. Rogers
- Lines: 12
- Reply-To: margoli@watson.IBM.com
- Disclaimer: This posting represents the poster's views, not necessarily those of IBM
- References: <92322.225618ADMN8647@RyeVm.Ryerson.Ca> <1992Nov20.174446.10649@rotag.mi.org>
- Nntp-Posting-Host: margoli.watson.ibm.com
- Organization: IBM T.J. Watson Research Center
-
- In <1992Nov20.174446.10649@rotag.mi.org> kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin Darcy) writes:
- >
- >And if you wish to quibble over the wording of the question, please reconsider
- >just expediting this issue by answering the ultimate question:
- >
- > In your opinion, does a woman have an unconditional, absolute legal
- > right to abort at any time in her pregnancy, for any reason?
-
- Since Roe v. Wade clearly allows for restrictions, the answer is obviously No.
- Did you mean to ask if she *should* have such a legal right?
- --
- Larry Margolis, MARGOLI@YKTVMV (Bitnet), margoli@watson.IBM.com (Internet)
-