home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 48731 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Text File  |  1992-11-19  |  1.1 KB  |  26 lines
  1. Newsgroups: talk.abortion
  2. Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!agate!stanford.edu!rock!taco!eceyv.ncsu.edu!dsh
  3. From: dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger)
  4. Subject: Re: In defense of Peter against "Lady" Adrienne
  5. Message-ID: <1992Nov20.062111.18327@ncsu.edu>
  6. Sender: news@ncsu.edu (USENET News System)
  7. Organization: North Carolina State University
  8. References: <nyikos.721587670@milo.math.scarolina.edu> <1992Nov20.003506.8807@ncsu.edu> <pkz1g1r@rpi.edu>
  9. Date: Fri, 20 Nov 1992 06:21:11 GMT
  10. Lines: 14
  11.  
  12. In article <pkz1g1r@rpi.edu> keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
  13. >dsh@eceyv.ncsu.edu (Doug Holtsinger) writes:
  14.  
  15. >> I don't consider myself to be "pro-choice" because I'm personally 
  16. >> undecided on the issue of legislation.
  17.  
  18. > whereas ms. bartley wants to legislate against some
  19. > abortions. based on that alone, it would appear that
  20. > her position is more anti-choice than yours.
  21.  
  22. The Keeganoid doesn't appear to be satisified with 
  23. defining the label "pro-choice"; now it wants to 
  24. define the label "anti-choice" as well.
  25.  
  26.