home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / talk / abortion / 48554 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-17  |  1.1 KB
  1. Xref: sparky talk.abortion:48554 soc.men:19574 alt.dads-rights:2645
  2. Newsgroups: talk.abortion,soc.men,alt.dads-rights
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!gumby!wupost!psuvax1!castor.cs.psu.edu!beaver
  4. From: beaver@castor.cs.psu.edu (Don Beaver)
  5. Subject: Re: Biological Reasons fo
  6. Message-ID: <Bxz3yH.A3x@cs.psu.edu>
  7. Sender: news@cs.psu.edu (Usenet)
  8. Nntp-Posting-Host: castor.cs.psu.edu
  9. References: <1992Nov13.194915.5587@desire.wright.edu> <1992Nov15.182630.21953@rotag.mi.org> <1992Nov15.171529.5616@desire.wright.edu>
  10. Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 17:15:51 GMT
  11. Lines: 16
  12.  
  13. In article <1992Nov15.171529.5616@desire.wright.edu> sbishop@desire.wright.edu writes:
  14.  
  15. >So, there was no prior consent to sex?  The man was raped?  The law looks
  16. >upon consenual sex as being the consent to being a parent.
  17.  
  18. >There's always a chance of error in the contrecetives
  19. >and they must take this risk into consideration.
  20.  
  21. This sounds remarkably like a justification for outlawing abortion.
  22.  
  23. Why should the unchosen penalty for contraceptive failure apply
  24. only to the man?
  25.  
  26. Don
  27. -- 
  28. beaver@cs.psu.edu                       Opinions from the PC-challenged
  29.