home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!murignis!horus.ap.mchp.sni.de!D012S658!frank
- From: frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: The answer (are the unborn alive?)!!!
- Date: 19 Nov 1992 12:07:00 GMT
- Organization: Siemens-Nixdorf AG
- Lines: 63
- Message-ID: <1eg014INN6aq@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de>
- References: <markts.721552522@mcl> <1eb4hgINNr1@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de> <1992Nov18.095021.10085@netcom.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: d012s658.ap.mchp.sni.de
-
- In article <1992Nov18.095021.10085@netcom.com> bskendig@netcom.com (Brian Kendig) writes:
- #frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer) writes:
- #>In article <markts.721552522@mcl> markts@mcl.ucsb.edu (mark.) writes:
- #>>
- #>> please let me rephrase: the unborn are composed
- #>> of living cells. but they lack the elusive soul
- #>> needed to be alive in our little christian
- #>> spectrum.
- #>
- #>Substute the minority group of your choice for 'unborn'. Now prove that the
- #>statement is true for 'unborn', and not for the minority group of your
- #>choice.
- #
- #Easy. Find something which is commonly considered as having a soul
- #(you, for example), and find something which is commonly considered as
- #not having a soul (a cat, for example). Note the differences between
-
- I once heard a theory (from a Catholic priest, believe it or not) that all
- species had their own Messiah. That is, cats and dolphins had their Christ
- two. I get this nice image of the dolphin's Messiah saying to them "look at
- the humans of the earth, are you not of more value than they". I bet the
- dolphins didn't crucify their Messiah either :-)
-
- What I am saying is "commonly considered" doesn't really work for me, sorry.
-
- Does a cat have a soul? Haven't a clue. I don't go out of my way to harm
- cats.
-
- #you and the cat that lead people to believe that you have a soul while
- #the cat doesn't: the ability to conceive of indirect solutions to
- #problems, the ability to use language, and so forth.
-
- These are measures of intelligence, not humanity. There are lots of people
- who can't do either of the things you mention to any useful degree, and some
- of them are my colleagues :-)
-
- #Now compare anything against the two of you. A minority person would
- #possess many, if not all, of the distinctions that distinguish you
- #from the cat.
-
- Only because YOU say so. Only because you want it to turn out that way,
- perhaps.
-
- #A fetus, on the other hand, would not, nor would it
- #even biologically be similar to either you nor the cat until late in
- #its development (that's biologically, note, not genetically).
-
- Sure. We can invent criteria which allow us to treat a foetus as less than
- fully human. Some of these criteria are even extremely reasonable ones.
- Nevertheless, some the actions which they are used to justify stink to
- high heaven. That's the data of immediate experience, and I'm willing to
- fly with that.
-
- I believe there's a certain amount of reverse engineering going on here. We
- can do this for just about any helpless minority, and have done, in living
- memory.
-
- #_/_/_/ Brian Kendig Je ne suis fait comme aucun
- --
- Frank.ODwyer@ap.mchp.sni.de "You take slaves when you make us free,
- when you make us free your way"
- World Party - 'Ain't going to come til I'm ready'
-
-