home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!mcsun!Germany.EU.net!murignis!horus.ap.mchp.sni.de!D012S658!frank
- From: frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Subject: Re: Why Pro-Lifers must support forced organ donation
- Date: 19 Nov 1992 07:55:28 GMT
- Organization: Siemens-Nixdorf AG
- Lines: 24
- Message-ID: <1efh9gINNcg9@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de>
- References: <lefty-161192123613@lefty.apple.com> <1eb8u7INN346@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de> <1992Nov17.221040.6631@noose.ecn.purdue.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: d012s658.ap.mchp.sni.de
-
- In article <1992Nov17.221040.6631@noose.ecn.purdue.edu> smccabe@author.ecn.purdue.edu (Sarah A McCabe) writes:
- >In article <1eb8u7INN346@horus.ap.mchp.sni.de> frank@D012S658.uucp (Frank O'Dwyer) writes:
- >>I disagree. Cancer cells never result in autonomous human beings. Cancer
- >>is a disease, and always unwelcome, pregnancy isn't.
- >
- >Could someone who has it archived please repost the article about interchaging
- >mouse tumors and embryos? The gist of it was that some experiments had
- >been done which took mouse cancers and implanted them in mouse wombs and
- >they grew into mouse fetuses while they took mouse embryos and implanted
- >them in other mouse locations and they turned into mouse cancers. This
- >suggests that the distinction between embryo and cancer is not as clear
- >as you might think.
-
- It's pretty clear to all of us, I think, that cancer is always unwelcome, and
- pregnancy isn't. I don't imagine women will voluntarily place cancer cells
- in their womb anytime soon, and I don't believe you do either.
-
- >Sarah McCabe
-
- --
- Frank.ODwyer@ap.mchp.sni.de "You take slaves when you make us free,
- when you make us free your way"
- World Party - 'Ain't going to come til I'm ready'
-
-