home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!linac!att!cbnewsk!cbnewsj!decay
- From: decay@cbnewsj.cb.att.com (dean.kaflowitz)
- Subject: Re: Roger Williams confused about what constitutes a lie!
- Organization: AT&T
- Distribution: na
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 04:16:50 GMT
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.041650.2816@cbnewsj.cb.att.com>
- References: <BxuA5H.xI@access.digex.com> <BxxtCM.MBA@access.digex.com>
- Lines: 21
-
- In article <BxxtCM.MBA@access.digex.com>, roger@access.digex.com (Roger Williams) writes:
- > ...In response Kaflowitz (if
- > memory serves) posted a gracious article complimenting me on
- > the extensiveness of my research and concluding that I was "a
- > scholar and a gentleman". (Although I suspect that now he wishes
- > he could have the words back).
-
- Nah. I deed them to you in fee simple absolute.
-
- I've gotten crankier over time. I know I posted something to you
- the other day in this thread. I don't recall being rude about it,
- but I take considerable exception to the notion that Mezias'
- making an error about one line of his being part of an article
- is somehow in any way egregious when compared to the deliberate
- attempt to post deceptive articles. Anyway, if I was rude,
- I apologize for that. Now watch yourself or the village idiot
- will accuse you of kowtowing.
-
- Dean Kaflowitz
-
-
-