home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!destroyer!ncar!noao!forgach
- From: forgach@noao.edu (Suzanne Forgach)
- Subject: Re: A Question for the Pro-Lifers or Anti-Abortionists or whatever
- Message-ID: <1992Nov19.000241.5744@noao.edu>
- Originator: forgach@gemini.tuc.noao.edu
- Sender: news@noao.edu
- Nntp-Posting-Host: gemini.tuc.noao.edu
- Organization: National Optical Astronomy Observatories, Tucson, AZ, USA
- References: <ymt1y#_@rpi.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 00:02:41 GMT
- Lines: 19
-
- From article <ymt1y#_@rpi.edu>, by cookc@aix.rpi.edu (rocker):
- > rpitts@emperor.gatech.edu (Richard Pitts) writes:
- >
- >>If you are pleading on the half of incest or rape victims, that is
- >>one matter. However, the MAJORITY do not fall into this and they
- >>DO NOT fall into this supposed UNWILLING catagory. They may and
- >>probably do fall into the UNPLANNED or rather LACK OF PLANNING
- >>catagory or even into the UNEDUCATED one. Families needs to teach their
- >>children (males and females) how to control their body - don't just let
- >>them run wild and then excuse their actions. The error of thinking
- >>that pregancy is unwilling is that the action (the sex act) is so
- >>trivialized and young girls think they need to give themselves to
- >>some supposed man to gain acceptance. Everyone needs to learn self-control
- >>and self-acceptance. One doesn't really gain either by having sex.
- >
- > For someone who professes to be a Christian, you sound terribly
- > full of hate. Perhaps you should ask yourself why this is so.
-
- Cathi, this is so bizarre, the only thing I can call it is a non-sequitor.
-