home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky talk.abortion:48410 alt.flame:14892
- Path: sparky!uunet!sun-barr!olivea!spool.mu.edu!news.nd.edu!catbox.cc.uni.edu!mglads
- From: mglads@catbox.cc.uni.edu (Melvin Gladstone)
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion,alt.flame
- Subject: Re: projection of the week: this week's winner!
- Message-ID: <1992Nov18.101409.7498@uni.edu>
- Date: 18 Nov 92 15:14:09 GMT
- Sender: news@uni.edu
- Organization: University of Northern Indiana
- Lines: 32
-
- In article <#=x1akd@rpi.edu>, keegan@acm.rpi.edu (James G. Keegan Jr.) writes:
- > "Why should I dispute *any* statement for which you do not produce
- > a scrap of evidence? I've only been disputing a lot of your statements
- > to show what a blusterer *you* are."
- > <nyikos.722018309@milo.math.scarolina.edu>
- > Peter Nyikos to dean kaflowitz
- >
- It looks like someone has taken Kevin's special place in the Keeganator's
- heart. So there is hope for me after all. Well here are some things
- which may win your affection.
-
- "I provide all necessary evidence to back up my claims to the extent
- I deem appropriate so as to provide future deniability."
-
- "Hey your SO beats puppies."
-
- "I am rabidly pro-choice on everything except those things which I
- don't think you should do."
-
- "Any marginally reasonable person may not have concluded that your
- article wasn't in fact a confirmation of the lack of a denial that
- your SO may not have beat puppies."
-
- "I am not paranoid, I have no delusions about the fact that you are
- all out to get me."
-
- "I will apologize for giving the impression the I did not vehemently
- reject the notion that your SO might beat puppies if you apologize
- for starting this thread when you should have known full well it would
- get around to this puppy thing."
-
- Melvin M. Gladstone
-