home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: talk.abortion
- Path: sparky!uunet!digex.com!roger
- From: roger@access.digex.com (Roger Williams)
- Subject: Re: Quote from ME
- Message-ID: <Bxvwop.M1x@access.digex.com>
- Sender: usenet@access.digex.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: access.digex.com
- Organization: Express Access Online Communications, Greenbelt, Maryland USA
- References: <23971@hacgate.SCG.HAC.COM> <1992Nov12.162153.1591@panix.com> <satdn4g@zola.esd.sgi.com> <1992Nov14.151657.8820@panix.com> <sen9tso@zola.esd.sgi.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 23:46:01 GMT
- Lines: 20
-
-
- In article <sen9tso@zola.esd.sgi.com>, cj@eno.esd.sgi.com (C.J. Silverio) writes:
- >
- >In article <1992Nov14.151657.8820@panix.com>, jk@panix.com writes:
- >|In <satdn4g@zola.esd.sgi.com> cj@eno.esd.sgi.com (C.J. Silverio) writes:
- >|>When nobody else is involved, nobody else has the right to
- >|>interfere.
- >
- >|If my greatest joy in life is torturing cats to death, does anyone
- >|else have the right to interfere?
- >
- >Are you destroying someone else's property?
-
- The local newspaper just had an item a few days ago concerning a man
- who was convicted of beating his (underline his) puppy to death. Do you
- think the state had a moral right to interfere with this man's puppy
- beating, CJ?
-
- Roger Williams
- roger@access.digex.com
-