home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
/ NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27 / NN_1992_27.iso / spool / soc / motss / 48246 < prev    next >
Encoding:
Internet Message Format  |  1992-11-18  |  1.4 KB
  1. Xref: sparky soc.motss:48246 alt.politics.homosexuality:7349 co.politics:2174 co.general:1841 talk.politics.misc:60739 co.politics.amend2.discuss:59 boulder.general:1059
  2. Newsgroups: soc.motss,alt.politics.homosexuality,co.politics,co.general,talk.politics.misc,co.politics.amend2.discuss,boulder.general,csu.general
  3. Path: sparky!uunet!charon.amdahl.com!pacbell.com!sgiblab!sdd.hp.com!hp-col!csn!neocad!wurtz
  4. From: wurtz@neocad.com (Tom Wurtz)
  5. Subject: Re: Don't boycott all of Colorado
  6. Message-ID: <1992Nov18.181602.14372@neocad.com>
  7. Organization: NeoCAD, Inc.
  8. References: <Nov15.215505.16307@yuma.ACNS.ColoState.EDU> <1992Nov15.235608.22978@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU> <1992Nov16.182934.20759@ncar.ucar.edu> <1992Nov16.195330.10398@ucsu.Colorado.EDU>
  9. Date: Wed, 18 Nov 1992 18:16:02 GMT
  10. Lines: 15
  11.  
  12. taylorje@rintintin.Colorado.EDU (TAYLOR JASON EDMOND) writes:
  13.  
  14. >having seen that Boulder, Denver, and just about every other major population
  15. >center voted it down,
  16.  
  17. I have seen this assertion a couple of times and I want to point out that
  18. the reason this legislation passed is that it passed in almost every
  19. suburban county around Denver, Boulder being an exception (I could be
  20. wrong about Adams county). The measure was defeated in Boulder and Denver
  21. cities, but passed in the rest of the Denver metro area. It could never
  22. have passed statewide had this not occurred. Draw your own conclusions
  23. about the makeup of these suburban counties.
  24.  
  25. t
  26.  
  27.