home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.motss
- Path: sparky!uunet!caen!uwm.edu!zazen!anderson
- From: anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson)
- Subject: Re: A question of plenty
- Message-ID: <1992Nov17.035828.22482@macc.wisc.edu>
- Sender: news@macc.wisc.edu (USENET News System)
- Organization: Madison Academic Computing Center, UW-Madison
- References: <1992Nov12.124751.1544@macc.wisc.edu> <1992Nov13.003139.21432@panix.com>
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 92 03:58:28 GMT
- Lines: 91
-
-
- In article <1992Nov13.003139.21432@panix.com> mara@panix.com
- (Mara Chibnik) writes:
-
- >anderson@macc.wisc.edu (Jess Anderson) writes:
-
- >>But looking out into the real world of acting, one certainly
- >>sees plenty of "effeminate" men and plenty of "overweight"
- >>women, all employed and doing fine jobs in their profession.
-
- >Does one, really?
-
- >Not "plenty" by my standards. Certainly not "plenty" of
- >"overweight" women.
-
- Well, I used quotes because neither word means a whole lot
- to me personally. They're such loaded terms, without much
- of what I'd call objective meaning. I probably should not
- have used them at all, except those were the terms the
- earlier discussion supplied, with the implication that
- people to whom they applied were not employable as
- professional actors.
-
- As to plenty, I misspoke there by not having much of a
- notion as to what plenty would mean. What I was thinking
- of, for what it's worth (maybe not much) is men who are not
- Stallone kind of butch and women who are not mannekin kind
- of thin.
-
- Either of those terms probably leaves the great middle on
- the as it were wrong side of the line; a man is not
- effeminate just because he's not as butch as Evander
- Holyfield, a woman is not overweight just because she weighs
- more than Vogue models. Obviously, the whole point suffers
- from the flaw that neither term is particularly descriptive;
- rather they are mostly judgmental terms.
-
- >And although it is possible for a certain kind of very
- >pretty young man to find happiness on stage or before the
- >cameras, these are not men I'd describe as "effeminate"
- >myself. (Of course, that's not an adjective I use much
- >unless I'm discussing what it means.)
-
- I guess that's worth doing. But I might use androgynous,
- rather than effeminate, to refer to that extremely pretty
- type of young man; since he was just mentioned here recently,
- Leonard Whiting comes to mind.
-
- >I am particularly surprised at Jess's contention that there
- >are plenty of overweight women in the profession. Of course
- >it's easy to name (say) a dozen of them.
-
- I doubt I could name a dozen. When I said that, I was
- thinking of women in their mature years who were certainly
- not thin but who were great actors: Colleen Dewhurst, Gena
- Rowlands.
-
- >But they constitute a very much smaller percentage of the
- >world that actors present to us than they do of the world in
- >which we spend our lives.
-
- This is a key point, one I should not have overlooked.
-
- >I consider this discrepancy largely responsible (directly
- >and indirectly) for the unrealistic body images that lead
- >women (especially) to anorexia and bulemia. I'm not
- >prepared to have the problem dismissed quite so cavalierly.
-
- Eating disorders and compulsions like anorexia and bulimia
- are no joke; neither are heart problems, diabetes, and
- chronic joint pain. Seen as health hazards (another mine
- field), I wonder if the people (of both genders) troubled by
- problems of too much weight don't significantly outnumber
- those troubled by too little. I have no idea what the facts
- are, however, apart from an occasional tv comment that
- obesity is a major health problem in the US.
-
- >I'd be interested to hear analogous arguments with regard to
- >effeminate men.
-
- Apart from the possibility of getting one bashed, I guess at
- least it would be less likely to involve one's health.
-
- <> The most common of all follies is to believe passionately
- <> in the palpably not true. It is the chief occupation of
- <> mankind. -- H.L. Mencken
- --
- [Jess Anderson <> Madison Academic Computing Center <> University of Wisconsin]
- [Internet: anderson@macc.wisc.edu <-best, UUCP:{}!uwvax!macc.wisc.edu!anderson]
- [Room 3130 <> 1210 West Dayton Street / Madison WI 53706 <> Phone 608/262-5888]
- [---------> Discrimination, Bigotry, and Hate are not Family Values <---------]
-