home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: soc.college
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!uchinews!ellis!thf2
- From: thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu (Ted Frank)
- Subject: Re: well..
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.195532.22117@midway.uchicago.edu>
- Sender: news@uchinews.uchicago.edu (News System)
- Reply-To: thf2@midway.uchicago.edu
- Organization: University of Chicago Computing Organizations
- References: <1992Nov18.225915.23507@midway.uchicago.edu> <1992Nov20.140136.2441@gacvx2.gac.edu> <1992Nov21.032055.2889@Princeton.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 19:55:32 GMT
- Lines: 22
-
- In article <1992Nov21.032055.2889@Princeton.EDU> rnoguchi@phoenix.Princeton.EDU (Ryan Alexander Noguchi) writes:
- >In article <1992Nov20.140136.2441@gacvx2.gac.edu>
- >censtad@perdita.gac.edu (Christopher B Enstad) writes:
- >[...]
- >>I'd like to see the law you quote so much which one is it that makes it
- >>illegal to copy and reprint public statements with the name of the person
- > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
- >>who made the comments included? Is it the same one that keeps the
- >>newspapers from reprinting Presidential speeches? Oh, I forgot, there
- >>isn't one.
- >
- >I too am interested in seeing the law regarding implicit copyright of
- >private mail, but to be fair, the law he cites concerns *private*
- >email, not *public* statements. Let's not be too eager to post a
- >"clever" flame that isn't relevant to the situation.
-
- Check out the news.announce.newusers FAQ. Which, hypothetically,
- everyone is supposed to have read before posting to the net.
- --
- ted frank | thf2@ellis.uchicago.edu
- standard disclaimers | void where prohibited
- the university of chicago law school, chicago, illinois 60637
-