NetNews Usenet Archive 1992 #27/NN_1992_27.iso/spool/soc/bi/15175

Text File | 1992-11-17 | 1.5 KB | 33 lines

Newsgroups: soc.bi
Path: sparky!uunet!caen!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu!sconley
From: [e-mail] (Icky White Male)
Subject: Re: I am not a white male. (was: PC)
Message-ID: <[e-mail]>
Originator: [e-mail]
Sender: [e-mail]
Nntp-Posting-Host: magnusug.magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu
Organization: White Male Conspiracy
References: <[e-mail]> <1992Nov12.191656.
Date: Mon, 16 Nov 1992 23:37:55 GMT
Lines: 19

[e-mail] (Muffy Barkocy) writes:

>I know that an ad hominem argument is not valid.  I also know that one
>was not *used*.  In logic terms, Mike was pointing out that you were
>operating from the premise that the world works the same way for
>everyone as it does for "white males."  Both of us have disputed this
          ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ [Oh, and how is that?]
>premise (I did so in the article you are responding to here), but you
>have not responded to that as yet.

I do not believe that it is worth a response.  You can count me out of this
discussion, since I'm suspected of being a male caucasian and anything I say
will be explained away as being a result of what are popularly believed on
soc.bi to be my skin color and genitalia, regardless of the kind of life I've
had to live or what I've been through or how I've come to my conclusions.

So, with respect to all that, fuck you, I don't care what you think.

[e-mail]