home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!cis.ohio-state.edu!news.sei.cmu.edu!fs7.ece.cmu.edu!crabapple.srv.cs.cmu.edu!amon@elegabalus.cs.qub.ac.uk
- From: amon@elegabalus.cs.qub.ac.uk
- Subject: Re: Shuttle replacement
- Message-ID: <By6K6I.4K6.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- X-Added: Forwarded by Space Digest
- Sender: news+@cs.cmu.edu
- Organization: [via International Space University]
- Original-Sender: isu@VACATION.VENARI.CS.CMU.EDU
- Distribution: sci
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 17:27:26 GMT
- Approved: bboard-news_gateway
- Lines: 25
-
- > On a related topic (your informative background on Delta Clipper) this
- > sounds like an excellent idea, but I'm nervous about it. Having grown up
- > in the Cape Canaveral area, and seen my share of boosters blow up or go
- > tumbling into the Atlantic, the idea of a powered descent and vertical
- > landing gives me the willies... I sure hope that thing has plenty of
- > redundancy... rocket engines have a way of conking out at innopportune
- > times.
- >
-
-
- Absolutely correct. And so do 747's. They make one *HELL* of a mess when they
- come down on an apartment block. Too 747's don't go straight up and down so
- they'd keep the incredible destruction of an accident inside the bounds of the
- airport. (Tongue in cheek, but barely...)
-
- Lets face it. The fuel load of a modern jumbo (and the superjumbo's they are
- talking about in Europe) is not significantly different from a DC-1. Because
- of the VTVL the DC-1 is probably less of a hazard to people than an airliner.
- Accidents usually happen at take off and landing. Both of these will be much
- more within the confines of the airport than airliners.
-
- BTW... Did the pictures of the Isreali crash into an apartment block get shown
- on the air over in the US (and the rest of the world) as much as here? Anyone
- heard outcries to allow 747's to only take off and land over water?
-
-