home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!dbased.nuo.dec.com!e2big.mko.dec.com!engage.pko.dec.com!ramblr.enet.dec.com!moroney
- From: moroney@ramblr.enet.dec.com
- Subject: Re: ROTATION OF THE MOON
- Message-ID: <1992Nov21.041526.10787@engage.pko.dec.com>
- Sender: newsdaemon@engage.pko.dec.com (USENET News Daemon)
- Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
- Distribution: na
- Date: Sat, 21 Nov 1992 03:55:02 GMT
- Lines: 39
-
- In article <1ejrttINNchl@gap.caltech.edu>, palmer@cco.caltech.edu (David M. Palmer) writes...
- >jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Josh 'K' Hopkins) writes:
- >
- >>labmas@stein.u.washington.edu (Michael Andersson) writes:
- >>>>Do you know if that rate is constant? Say around 63M years ago,
- >>>>around the time of the end of the dinosaurs, the day would have
- >>>>been 175 hrs longer!
-
- >>>No. If the rotation is slowing, then days used to be shorter.
-
- >>Right, so the rate obviously isn't constant or the Earth would have been
- >>spinning at relativistic speeds shortly before our astraulopithic ancestors
- >>appeared. Since the rates depends on tides and gravitational fields it's very
- >>likely that there are exponential terms in the equation. If I recall correctly,
- >>you have cubics in the formula for tidal forces, which results in a much
- >>different curve than trying to plot it linearly.
-
- I remember seeing a discussion studying the fossils of some coral. The coral
- animals adds a thin layer of coral every day, and in the summer it adds more
- each day. This gives something like growth rings of trees. From studying the
- daily variations and the annual variations the length of the years measured in
- the length of the days of the time can be determined. If I remember correctly
- there were 370 days in a year at the time when the dinosaurs died out (meaning
- the days were ~23h40m long), and early fossils showed 400 day years (or days
- shorter than 22 hours).
-
- >I have heard (potential Urban Legend warning) that one of the ocean basins
- >(Pacific? Atlantic?) has a slosh frequency which is resonant with the
- >tides, which greatly increases the tidal drag. In the past, the continents
- >were at different positions, so the oceans had different frequencies,
- >so the tidal drag was much less.
-
- I read somewhere that half the ocean's tidal friction was in the Bering Strait
- and it has something to do with it being shallow.
-
- Sorry, no references to either of these tidbits of information, my mind is
- full of useless trivia like this, most all without references.
-
- -Mike
-