home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: sparky!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!nntp-server.caltech.edu!palmer
- From: palmer@cco.caltech.edu (David M. Palmer)
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Subject: Re: ROTATION OF THE MOON
- Date: 20 Nov 1992 23:21:33 GMT
- Organization: California Institute of Technology, Pasadena
- Lines: 26
- Distribution: na
- Message-ID: <1ejrttINNchl@gap.caltech.edu>
- References: <1992Nov18.163804.1213@sunspot.noao.edu> <1992Nov19.144441.5498@col.hp.com> <1992Nov19.220246.6719@u.washington.edu> <By1AC5.Kts@news.cso.uiuc.edu>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: alumni.caltech.edu
-
- jbh55289@uxa.cso.uiuc.edu (Josh 'K' Hopkins) writes:
-
- >labmas@stein.u.washington.edu (Michael Andersson) writes:
- >>>Do you know if that rate is constant? Say around 63M years ago,
- >>>around the time of the end of the dinosaurs, the day would have
- >>>been 175 hrs longer!
-
- >>No. If the rotation is slowing, then days used to be shorter.
-
- >Right, so the rate obviously isn't constant or the Earth would have been
- >spinning at relativistic speeds shortly before our astraulopithic ancestors
- >appeared. Since the rates depends on tides and gravitational fields it's very
- >likely that there are exponential terms in the equation. If I recall correctly,
- >you have cubics in the formula for tidal forces, which results in a much
- >different curve than trying to plot it linearly.
-
- I have heard (potential Urban Legend warning) that one of the ocean basins
- (Pacific? Atlantic?) has a slosh frequency which is resonant with the
- tides, which greatly increases the tidal drag. In the past, the continents
- were at different positions, so the oceans had different frequencies,
- so the tidal drag was much less.
-
-
- eno
- --
- David Palmer palmer@alumni.caltech.edu
-