home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Xref: sparky sci.space:16124 alt.sci.planetary:336
- Newsgroups: sci.space,alt.sci.planetary
- Path: sparky!uunet!utcsri!utzoo!henry
- From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- Subject: Re: Lunar "colony" reality check
- Message-ID: <BxzIK5.4Cq@zoo.toronto.edu>
- Date: Thu, 19 Nov 1992 22:31:16 GMT
- References: <1992Nov10.152154.9709@eng.ufl.edu> <1992Nov14.004211.12960@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au> <1992Nov19.020207.11499@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au>
- Organization: U of Toronto Zoology
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <1992Nov19.020207.11499@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au> wharvey@gucis.cit.gu.edu.au (Wayne Harvey) writes:
- >I seem to remember some theory a while back that the moon was actually
- >*captured* by Earth at some stage (I think it was about 800 million
- >years ago)...
-
- The three classical theories of lunar formation -- fission from Earth,
- formation in orbit around Earth, and capture -- were all pretty much
- destroyed by analysis of the Apollo samples. Earth and Moon are too
- similar to have formed far apart, and too different to have formed
- together unless you add some extra factor to give them very different
- histories. The giant-impact theory fits the bill, and the facts.
-
- >... when you assume that the only mineral explorations done on
- >the lunar surface were conducted in the equivalent of the Sahara.
-
- Not a very tenable assumption. For one thing, those explorations got
- samples from a much wider range of locations, courtesy of splashes
- from meteorite impacts. For another, even the "local" rocks differed
- a great deal between sites. (The lunar scientists were against landing
- Apollo 12 at a site that looked so similar to the Apollo 11 site, but
- they shut up when they saw the preliminary results from the Apollo 12
- samples.) There's no doubt that we've sampled only a little of the Moon's
- geological diversity -- and useful ore bodies are often very localized
- things, the results of extreme conditions -- but we do have enough data
- to be fairly confident of the average composition.
- --
- MS-DOS is the OS/360 of the 1980s. | Henry Spencer @ U of Toronto Zoology
- -Hal W. Hardenbergh (1985)| henry@zoo.toronto.edu utzoo!henry
-