home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.space
- Path: sparky!uunet!digex.com!prb
- From: prb@access.digex.com (Pat)
- Subject: Re: Shuttle computers
- Message-ID: <BxuGHC.4qK@access.digex.com>
- Sender: usenet@access.digex.com
- Nntp-Posting-Host: access.digex.com
- Organization: UDSI
- References: <BxsMA3.D2o.1@cs.cmu.edu>
- Distribution: sci
- Date: Tue, 17 Nov 1992 04:58:22 GMT
- Lines: 28
-
- In article <BxsMA3.D2o.1@cs.cmu.edu> roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov (John Roberts) writes:
- >
- >-From: henry@zoo.toronto.edu (Henry Spencer)
- >-Subject: Re: What kind of computers are in the shuttle?
- >-Date: 14 Nov 92 23:58:37 GMT
- >
- >-There are also some other little problems, like the fact that the orbiter
- >-computers aren't independent systems -- those five main computers operate
- >-in very close lockstep for fault tolerance. This isn't just a tougher
- >-version of a commercial computer system.
- >
- >Do you recall how tight the lockstep is? I don't believe I've seen anything
- >written on that since before STS-1.
- >
- >John Roberts
- >roberts@cmr.ncsl.nist.gov
-
- I think it was 1/2 a clock. i believe every instruction is run at the same
- time on each processor and when a computation is ready they go to the master
- for comparison and validation.
- one of the first shuttle flights was screwed up because IBM tested the
- software ona ground test bed which had different cable lengths then the
- shuttle and the propagation delay was putting the clock edges enough out that
- they kept locking out the slave in each pair. i think it was something
- like this. there are two control channels, each has a primary and backup
- computer. the backups kept going off-line and the mission got scrubbed.
- i am sure henry knows the true details but thats how a guyt from IBM
- explained it to me.
-