home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Newsgroups: sci.skeptic
- Path: sparky!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!cs.uiuc.edu!m.cs.uiuc.edu!cs.uiuc.edu!mcgrath
- From: mcgrath@cs.uiuc.edu (Robert McGrath)
- Subject: Re: Rant concludes
- Message-ID: <1992Nov23.183213.29857@m.cs.uiuc.edu>
- Sender: news@m.cs.uiuc.edu (News Database (admin-Mike Schwager))
- Reply-To: mcgrath@cs.uiuc.edu
- Organization: University of Illinois, Dept of Computer Science
- References: <722160639.0@wyrm.rbbs-net.ORG> <1992Nov20.135325.7347@relay.nswc.navy.mil>
- Date: Mon, 23 Nov 1992 18:32:13 GMT
- Lines: 26
-
- In article <1992Nov20.135325.7347@relay.nswc.navy.mil>, snorthc@relay.nswc.navy.mil (Stephen Northcutt) writes in part:
- |> I do remember being singularly unimpressed
- |> with freshman geology and geomorphology "how do they KNOW, that
- |> hunk of blue quartz is a billion years old?" Think of it as
- |> "reverse" skepticism.
-
- I think of it as "know nothingness". Most "freshmen" are skeptical
- of things that are not "intuitively obvious", i.e., that they haven't
- experienced or thought about before. This is natural, but one must
- be grow out of.
-
- If you had HONESTLY raised the "how do they know" question, I am
- positive you would have found plenty of pointers in the references
- that would have led you to discover the good reasons for trusting the
- claims of geomorphology. This is sometimes called "learning".
-
- |> Disclaimer: I am not asserting ANYTHING, I was just trying to
- |> make you smile, this is a light hearted post!
-
- Being ignorant is nothing to be ashamed of, but it always embarasses
- me to see someone who is proud of his ignorance.
-
- --
- Robert E. McGrath
- Urbana Illinois
- mcgrath@cs.uiuc.edu
-